Activating the Right to Be Rescued
Research output: Contribution to journal › Research article › Contributed › peer-review
Contributors
Abstract
When a person finds herself in peril her right to be rescued is activated and a rescue duty is imposed on those who are in a position to help. In this article, I argue that the activation of the right to be rescued needs to be suitably constrained so that the rescuee is prevented from arbitrarily controlling the normative situation between herself and potential rescuers. Such control would be in conflict with the moral equality of persons. I argue that the activation of the right to be rescued should be conditional on the person having a justification for the action that caused her peril. One implication of my view is that the right to be rescued cannot fulfill the function that Jonathan Quong ascribes to it. The right to be rescued turns out to be an unsuitable ground for the necessity condition which constrains the permissible use of defensive force.
Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 415 - 438 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Journal of Moral Philosophy |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 5-6 |
Publication status | Published - 19 Jul 2022 |
Peer-reviewed | Yes |
Externally published | Yes |
External IDs
Scopus | 85135053836 |
---|---|
Mendeley | 09a9105f-e83f-37dc-9206-5d2771ed4dcf |
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Keywords
- necessity condition, duty imposition, right to be rescued, self-defense