Accuracy Assessment of Articulated Industrial Robots using the Extended- and the Loaded-Double-Ball-Bar

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Johann August Marwitz - , Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (Author)
  • Nikolas Alexander Theissen - , KTH Royal Institute of Technology (Author)
  • Monica Katherine Gonzalez - , KTH Royal Institute of Technology (Author)
  • Christian Friedrich - , Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (Author)
  • Arvid Hellmich - , Chair of Machine Tools Development and Adaptive Controls, Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (Author)
  • Andreas Archenti - , KTH Royal Institute of Technology (Author)
  • Steffen Ihlenfeldt - , Chair of Machine Tools Development and Adaptive Controls, Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (Author)

Abstract

This research paper outlines the methodology and application of geometric and static accuracy assessment of articulated industrial robots using the Extended Double Ball Bar (EDBB) as well as the Loaded Double Ball Bar (LDBB). In a first experiment, the EDBB is used to assess the geometric accuracy of a Comau NJ-130 robot. Advanced measuring trajectories are investigated that regard poses or axes configurations, which maximize the error influences of individual robot components, and, in this manner, increase the sensitivity for a large number of individual error parameters. The developed error-sensitive trajectories are validated in experimental studies and compared to the circular trajectories according to ISO 203-4. Next, the LDBB is used to assess an ABB IRB6700 manipulator under quasi-static loads of up to 600 Newton using circular testing according to ISO 230-4. The stiffness is identified from the loaded circular trajectories. Then, the stiffness is used to perform a reverse calculation to identify the kinematic errors on the path deviations. The concept is validated in a case study of quasi-static loaded circular testing using the LDBB compared to a Leica AT960 laser tracker (LT).

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-98
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Machine Engineering
Volume2022
Issue number22(2)
Publication statusPublished - 2022
Peer-reviewedYes