A Phase 1 Study of the DNA-PK Inhibitor Peposertib in Combination With Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Tumors

Research output: Contribution to journalResearch articleContributedpeer-review

Contributors

  • Michael Samuels - , Banner Health (Author)
  • Johan Falkenius - , Karolinska Institutet (Author)
  • Voichita Bar-Ad - , Thomas Jefferson University (Author)
  • Juergen Dunst - , University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck (Author)
  • Baukelien van Triest - , Netherlands Cancer Institute (Author)
  • Jeffrey Yachnin - , Karolinska Institutet (Author)
  • Almudena Rodriguez-Gutierrez - , Saint Louis University (Author)
  • Mirjam Kuipers - , Merck KGaA (Author)
  • Xiaoli You - , Merck KGaA (Author)
  • Barbara Sarholz - , Merck KGaA (Author)
  • Giuseppe Locatelli - , Merck KGaA (Author)
  • Andreas Becker - , Merck KGaA (Author)
  • Esther G.C. Troost - , Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) (Author)

Abstract

Purpose: DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) plays a key role in the repair of DNA double strand breaks via nonhomologous end joining. Inhibition of DNA-PK can enhance the effect of DNA double strand break inducing anticancer therapies. Peposertib (formerly “M3814”) is an orally administered, potent, and selective small molecule DNA-PK inhibitor that has demonstrated radiosensitizing and antitumor activity in xenograft models and was well-tolerated in monotherapy. This phase 1 trial (National Clinical Trial 02516813) investigated the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and tolerability of peposertib in combination with palliative radiation therapy (RT) in patients with thoracic or head and neck tumors (arm A) and of peposertib in combination with cisplatin and curative-intent RT in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (arm B). Methods and Materials: Patients received peposertib once daily in ascending dose cohorts as a tablet or capsule in combination with palliative RT (arm A) or in combination with intensity modulated curative-intent RT and cisplatin (arm B). Results: The most frequently observed treatment-emergent adverse events were radiation skin injury, fatigue, and nausea in arm A (n = 34) and stomatitis, nausea, radiation skin injury, and dysgeusia in arm B (n = 11). Based on evaluations of dose-limiting toxicities, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data, RP2D for arm A was declared as 200 mg peposertib tablet once daily in combination with RT. In arm B (n = 11), 50 mg peposertib was declared tolerable in combination with curative-intent RT and cisplatin. However, enrollment was discontinued because of insufficient exposure at that dose, and the RP2D was not formally declared. Conclusions: Peposertib in combination with palliative RT was well-tolerated up to doses of 200 mg once daily as tablet with each RT fraction. When combined with RT and cisplatin, a tolerable peposertib dose yielded insufficient exposure.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)743-756
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume118
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2024
Peer-reviewedYes

External IDs

PubMed 37751793