Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Marian Christoph - , Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • David Poitz - , Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin, Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Christian Pfluecke - , Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Mathias Forkmann - , Klinikum Coburg (Autor:in)
  • Yan Huo - , Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Gaspar - , Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Steffen Schoen - , Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Karim Ibrahim - , Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Silvio Quick - , Klinik für Kardiochirurgie (am Herzzentrum), Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Carsten Wunderlich - , Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)

Abstract

Background: Doppler microembolic signals (MES) occur during atrial fibrillation ablation despite of permanent flushed transseptal sheaths, frequent controls of periprocedural coagulation status and the use of irrigated ablation catheters Purpose: To investigate the number and type of MES depending on the procedure time, prespecified procedure steps, the activated clotting time (ACT) during the ablation procedure and the catheter contact force. Methods: In a prospective trial, 53 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation by super-irrigated “point-by-point” ablation. All patients underwent a periinterventional, continuous transcranial Doppler examination (TCD) of the bilateral middle cerebral arteries during the complete ablation procedure. Results: An average of 686±226 microembolic signals were detected by permanent transcranial Doppler. Thereby, 569±208 signals were differentiated as gaseous and 117±31 as solid MES. The number of MES with regard to defined procedure steps were as follows: gaseous: [transseptal puncture, 26 ± 28; sheath flushing, 24±12; catheter change, 21±11; angiography, 101±28; mapping, 9±9; ablation, 439±192; protamine administration, 0±0]; solid: [transseptal puncture, 8±8; sheath flushing, 9±5; catheter replacement, 6±6; angiography, not measurable; mapping, 2±5; ablation, 41±22; protamine administration, 0±0]. Significantly less MES occurred with shorter procedure time, higher ACT and the use of tissue contact force monitoring. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that during atrial fibrillation ablation using irrigated, “point-by-point” RF ablation, masses of microembolic signals are detected in transcranial ultrasound especially in the period of RF current application. The number of MES depends on the total procedure time and the reached ACT during ablation. The use of contact force monitoring might reduce MES during RF ablation.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)359-365
Seitenumfang7
FachzeitschriftJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology
Jahrgang64
Ausgabenummer2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Aug. 2022
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 34060007
ORCID /0000-0001-7803-1972/work/142235081

Schlagworte

Fächergruppen, Lehr- und Forschungsbereiche, Fachgebiete nach Destatis

Schlagwörter

  • Ablation, Cardiac arrhythmias, Contact force monitoring, Embolic embolism, Prospective Studies, Humans, Intracranial Embolism/diagnostic imaging, Catheter Ablation/methods, Treatment Outcome, Pulmonary Veins/diagnostic imaging, Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging, Protamines