Parental considerations about their childs’ mental health: Validating the German adaptation of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Andreas S. Wildner - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)
  • Su Mevsim Küçükakyüz - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)
  • Anton K.G. Marx - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)
  • Tobias Nolte - , University College London (Autor:in)
  • Corinna Reck - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)
  • Peter Fonagy - , University College London (Autor:in)
  • Patrick Luyten - , University College London (Autor:in)
  • Alexandra von Tettenborn - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)
  • Mitho Müller - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)
  • Anna Lena Zietlow - , Professur für Klinische Kinder- und Jugendpsychologie (Autor:in)
  • Christian F.J. Woll-Weber - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Freie Universität (FU) Berlin (Autor:in)

Abstract

Introduction Parental Reflective Functioning describes the parents’ ability to view their child as motivated by mental states. The Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) represents an 18-item and three-factor self-report measure. Our goal was to conduct the first German validation study. Method In a community sample of 378 mothers of children aged 10.2–78.6 months, we used Confirmatory Factor Analysis with a cross-validation approach to assess model fit. Reliability was measured using Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω. Concurrent validity was assessed using correlations with relevant constructs. Results The three-factor structure of the original validation could be confirmed. The German model only needed minor modifications: two items had to be removed, and one error covariance was added. The resulting 16-item questionnaire with the three subscales “Pre-mentalizing”, “Interest and Curiosity about Mental States”, and “Certainty about Mental States” was successfully cross-validated (CFI = .94, TLI = .93, SRMR = .07, RMSEA = .04 (CI [.01, .06])). These factors were related in theoretically expected ways to parental attachment dimensions, emotional availability, parenting stress, and infant attachment status. Conclusion While reliability could still be improved, the German 16-item version of the PRFQ represents a valid measure of parental reflective functioning.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummere0314074
FachzeitschriftPloS one
Jahrgang19
Ausgabenummer12
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Dez. 2024
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 39630624
ORCID /0000-0002-7278-5711/work/184006413

Schlagworte

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete