NanoDefiner Framework and e-Tool Revisited According to the European Commission’s Nanomaterial Definition 2022/C 229/01

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Raphael Brüngel - , Fachhochschule (FH) Dortmund, Universitätsklinikum Essen (Autor:in)
  • Johannes Rückert - , Fachhochschule (FH) Dortmund (Autor:in)
  • Philipp Müller - , BASF SE (Autor:in)
  • Frank Babick - , Arbeitsgruppe Mechanische Verfahrenstechnik (MVT) (Autor:in)
  • Christoph M. Friedrich - , Fachhochschule (FH) Dortmund, Universitätsklinikum Essen (Autor:in)
  • Antoine Ghanem - , Solvay S.A. (Autor:in)
  • Vasile-Dan Hodoroaba - , Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) (Autor:in)
  • Agnieszka Mech - , European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) Ispra (Autor:in)
  • Stefan Weigel - , Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR) (Autor:in)
  • Wendel Wohlleben - , BASF SE (Autor:in)
  • Hubert Rauscher - , European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) Ispra (Autor:in)

Abstract

The new recommended definition of a nanomaterial, 2022/C 229/01, adopted by the European Commission in 2022, will have a considerable impact on European Union legislation addressing chemicals, and therefore tools to implement this new definition are urgently needed. The updated NanoDefiner framework and its e-tool implementation presented here are such instruments, which help stakeholders to find out in a straightforward way whether a material is a nanomaterial or not. They are two major outcomes of the NanoDefine project, which is explicitly referred to in the new definition. This work revisits the framework and e-tool, and elaborates necessary adjustments to make these outcomes applicable for the updated recommendation. A broad set of case studies on representative materials confirms the validity of these adjustments. To further foster the sustainability and applicability of the framework and e-tool, measures for the FAIRification of expert knowledge within the e-tool’s knowledge base are elaborated as well. The updated framework and e-tool are now ready to be used in line with the updated recommendation. The presented approach may serve as an example for reviewing existing guidance and tools developed for the previous definition 2011/696/EU, particularly those adopting NanoDefine project outcomes.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer990
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftNanomaterials
Jahrgang13
Ausgabenummer6
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - März 2023
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 85151524728
ORCID /0000-0001-5958-2111/work/173049764

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • FAIRification, decision support, nanomaterial categorisation, nanomaterial definition, nanomaterial legislation, nanomaterial regulation