Machine-Checking Unforgeability Proofs for Signature Schemes with Tight Reductions to the Computational Diffie-Hellman Problem

Publikation: Beitrag zu KonferenzenPaperBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

Abstract

Digital signatures based on the Discrete Logarithm (DL) problem often suffer from long signature sizes, and reductions made loose by the use of Pointcheval and Stern’s Forking Lemma. At EUROCRYPT 2003, Goh and Jarecki provided the first forking-free proof of unforgeability for a DL-based signature scheme—rooting its security in the hardness of the Computational Diffie-Hellman problem in the random oracle model. In this paper, we present and discuss the first machine-checked proofs for DL-based signature schemes reducing tightly to CDH, produced using EasyCrypt. We craft our proofs around a shim which reduces the local proof effort, and helps us identify patterns that can be easily adapted to similar tightly-secure DL-based schemes.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seitenumfang15
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2021
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Konferenz

Titel2021 IEEE 34th Computer Security Foundations Symposium
KurztitelCSF 2021
Veranstaltungsnummer34
Dauer21 - 24 Juni 2021
BekanntheitsgradInternationale Veranstaltung
Ortonline
StadtDubrovnik
LandKroatien

Externe IDs

Scopus 85125348176

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • cryptography, machine-checked-proofs, digital signatures, adaptation models, Computational modeling, computer securtity, Digital signatures, tightly-secure DL-based schemes, machine-checking unforgeability proofs, Computational Diffie-Hellman problem, Discrete Logarithm problem, long signature sizes