Large language models for structured reporting in radiology: past, present, and future

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsartikel (Review)BeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Felix Busch - , Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI TUM) (Autor:in)
  • Lena Hoffmann - , Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI TUM) (Autor:in)
  • Daniel Pinto dos Santos - , Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Marcus R. Makowski - , Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI TUM) (Autor:in)
  • Luca Saba - , University Hospital of Cagliari (Autor:in)
  • Philipp Prucker - , Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI TUM) (Autor:in)
  • Martin Hadamitzky - , Deutsche Herzzentrum München (Autor:in)
  • Nassir Navab - , Technische Universität München (Autor:in)
  • Jakob Nikolas Kather - , Else Kröner Fresenius Zentrum für Digitale Gesundheit, Nationales Zentrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Daniel Truhn - , Universitätsklinikum Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Renato Cuocolo - , University of Salerno (Autor:in)
  • Lisa C. Adams - , Klinikum Rechts der Isar (MRI TUM) (Autor:in)
  • Keno K. Bressem - , Deutsche Herzzentrum München (Autor:in)

Abstract

Abstract: Structured reporting (SR) has long been a goal in radiology to standardize and improve the quality of radiology reports. Despite evidence that SR reduces errors, enhances comprehensiveness, and increases adherence to guidelines, its widespread adoption has been limited. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising solution to automate and facilitate SR. Therefore, this narrative review aims to provide an overview of LLMs for SR in radiology and beyond. We found that the current literature on LLMs for SR is limited, comprising ten studies on the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT)-3.5 (n = 5) and/or GPT-4 (n = 8), while two studies additionally examined the performance of Perplexity and Bing Chat or IT5. All studies reported promising results and acknowledged the potential of LLMs for SR, with six out of ten studies demonstrating the feasibility of multilingual applications. Building upon these findings, we discuss limitations, regulatory challenges, and further applications of LLMs in radiology report processing, encompassing four main areas: documentation, translation and summarization, clinical evaluation, and data mining. In conclusion, this review underscores the transformative potential of LLMs to improve efficiency and accuracy in SR and radiology report processing. Key Points: Question How can LLMs help make SR in radiology more ubiquitous? Findings Current literature leveraging LLMs for SR is sparse but shows promising results, including the feasibility of multilingual applications. Clinical relevance LLMs have the potential to transform radiology report processing and enable the widespread adoption of SR. However, their future role in clinical practice depends on overcoming current limitations and regulatory challenges, including opaque algorithms and training data.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)2589–2602
FachzeitschriftEuropean radiology
Jahrgang35
Frühes Online-Datum23 Okt. 2024
PublikationsstatusElektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung - 23 Okt. 2024
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 39438330

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Artificial intelligence, Electronic data processing, Medical informatics, Natural language processing, Radiology