How to measure the accessibility maturity of organizations - A survey on accessibility maturity models for higher education.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsartikel (Review)BeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Nadine Auer - , Universität Stuttgart, Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Samira Kalemba - , Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg (Autor:in)
  • Christin Stormer - , Universität Bielefeld (Autor:in)
  • Ann-Katrin Böhm - , Heidelberg University of Education (Autor:in)
  • Hakan Çetin - , Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg (Autor:in)
  • Anja Gutjahr - , Heidelberg University of Education (Autor:in)
  • Franziska Neumann - , Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg (Autor:in)
  • Verena Kersken - , Universität Stuttgart (Autor:in)
  • Gerhard Weber - , Professur für Mensch-Computer-Interaktion (Autor:in)
  • Gottfried Zimmermann - , Universität Stuttgart (Autor:in)

Abstract

Maturity models are increasingly used to advance the processes of organizations, including Higher Education Institutions. In this paper, we review existing maturity models to analyze and optimize the accessibility of organizations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature research in the databases Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, BASE, ACM, and Google Scholar, resulting in 13 different maturity models. An additional web search on maturity models for accessibility found another 12 maturity models that we added to the results. Finally, we analyzed the 25 maturity models in more detail, specifically the indicators that each maturity model uses to measure accessibility. The most frequent indicators were “responsibility”, “competences & training”, and “monitoring”, with differences in the frequencies when separated by target group. Out of the 25 maturity models found, only 6 focused on Higher Education Institutions. None of the existing maturity models focuses on teaching and learning of accessibility explicitly.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer1134320
FachzeitschriftFrontiers in Computer Science
Jahrgang5
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2023
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 85165029882
ORCID /0000-0002-1890-4281/work/159607973

Schlagworte

Bibliotheksschlagworte