Electrokinetic characterization of poly(acrylic acid) and poly(ethylene oxide) brushes in aqueous electrolyte solutions

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Ralf Zimmermann - , Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Willem Norde - , Wageningen University & Research (WUR), University of Groningen (Autor:in)
  • Martien A.Cohen Stuart - , Wageningen University & Research (WUR) (Autor:in)
  • Carsten Werner - , Professur für Biofunktionale Polymermaterialien (gB/IPF), Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden, University of Toronto (Autor:in)

Abstract

Surfaces carrying hydrophilic polymer brushes were prepared from poly(styrene)-poly(acrylic acid) and poly(styrene)-poly(ethylene oxide) diblock copolymers, respectively, using a Langmuir-Blodgett technique and employing poly(styrene)-coated planar glass as substrates. The electrical properties of these surfaces in aqueous electrolyte were analyzed as a function of pH and KCl concentration using streaming potential/streaming current measurements. From these data, both the zeta potential and the surface conductivity could be obtained. The poly(acrylic acid) brushes are charged due to the dissociation of carboxylic acid groups and give theoretical surface potentials of -160 mV at full dissociation in 10-3 M solutions. The surface conductivity of these brushes is enormous under these conditions, accounting for more than 93% of the total measured surface conductivity. However, the mobility of the ions within the brush was estimated from the density of the carboxylic acid groups and the surface conductivity data to be only about 14% of that of free ions. The poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) brushes effectively screen the charge of the underlying substrate, giving a very low zeta potential except when the ionic strength is very low. From the data, a hydrodynamic layer thickness of the PEO brushes could be estimated which is in good agreement with independent experiments (neutron reflectivity) and theoretical estimates. The surface conductivity in this system was slightly lower than that of the polystyren substrate. This also indicates that no significant amount of preferentially, i.e., nonelectrostatically attracted, ions taken up in the brush.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)5108-5114
Seitenumfang7
FachzeitschriftLangmuir
Jahrgang21
Ausgabenummer11
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 24 Mai 2005
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 20444405714
ORCID /0000-0003-0189-3448/work/173985690