CpG-biomarkers in tumor tissue and prediction models for the survival of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and external validation study

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsartikel (Review)BeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Tanwei Yuan - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Dominic Edelmann - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Jakob N. Kather - , Else Kröner Fresenius Zentrum für Digitale Gesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Ziwen Fan - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Katrin E. Tagscherer - , Universität Heidelberg, Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Wilfried Roth - , Universität Heidelberg, Universitätsmedizin Mainz (Autor:in)
  • Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Alexander Brobeil - , Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Matthias Kloor - , Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Hendrik Bläker - , Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)
  • Barbara Burwinkel - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Hermann Brenner - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Michael Hoffmeister - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)

Abstract

The research aimed to identify previously published CpG-methylation-based prognostic biomarkers and prediction models for colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis and validate them in a large external cohort. A systematic search was conducted, analyzing 298 unique CpGs and 12 CpG-based prognostic models from 28 studies. After adjustment for clinical variables, 48 CpGs and five prognostic models were confirmed to be associated with survival. However, the discrimination ability of the models was insufficient, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranging from 0.53 to 0.62. Calibration accuracy was mostly poor, and no significant added prognostic value beyond traditional clinical variables was observed. All prognostic models were rated at high risk of bias. While a fraction of CpGs showed potential clinical utility and generalizability, the CpG-based prognostic models performed poorly and lacked clinical relevance.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer104199
FachzeitschriftCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Jahrgang193
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Jan. 2024
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 37952858

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • Biomarkers, Colorectal cancer, DNA methylation, External validation, Prognosis, Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis, DNA Methylation, Humans, Biomarkers, Tumor