What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Anja Hahne - , Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften (Autor:in)

Abstract

German sentences which were either correct, contained a selectional restriction violation, or a word category violation were presented auditorily to 16 native speakers of German (L1 group) and to 16 native speakers of Russian, who had learned German after the age of 10 (L2 group). Semantic violations elicited an N400 effect for both groups, but with a reduced amplitude and a longer peak latency in the L2 group. Compared to correct sentences, sentences with a phrase structure violation elicited an early anterior negativity followed by a broad centro-parietal positivity in native speakers. By contrast, there was no differential modulation of the early anterior negativity in the L2 group. A late positivity was also elicited in the second language learners, but it was slightly delayed compared to that shown by native speakers. This pattern is discussed in terms of different degrees of automaticity with respect to the subprocesses involved in sentence comprehension.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)251-266
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftJournal of Psycholinguistic Research
Jahrgang30
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2001
Peer-Review-StatusJa
Extern publiziertJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 11523274
ORCID /0000-0002-8487-9977/work/148145446

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • ERPs, Second language learning, Semantics, Sentence processing, Syntax