Welche Migränepatienten werden mit CGRP(R)-Antikörpern behandelt? Ein Vergleich zu unspezifischen oralen Prophylaktika anhand von Daten des DMKG-Kopfschmerzregisters

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Ruth Ruscheweyh - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)
  • Gudrun Goßrau - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitäts SchmerzCentrum (Autor:in)
  • Tim Patrick Jürgens - , Universität Rostock, KMG Klinikum Güstrow (Autor:in)
  • Victoria Ruschil - , Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (Autor:in)
  • Torsten Kraya - , Klinikum St. Georg Leipzig, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Dresler - , Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Deutsches Zentrum für Psychische Gesundheit (DZPG) - Standort Tübingen (Autor:in)
  • Charly Gaul - , Kopfschmerzzentrum Frankfurt (Autor:in)
  • Jörg Scheidt - , Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hof (Autor:in)
  • Lars Neeb - , Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel (Autor:in)

Abstract

Background: Antibodies against CGRP or its receptor (eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, from here on: “CGRP(R) antibodies”) are modern migraine preventives. German statutory health insurance covers CGRP(R) antibodies only for patients refractory to other preventive therapies. Thus, the effect of this regulation on patient selection was investigated, as well as the effect of a change of insurance coverage for erenumab in October 2022. Methods: In total, 759 patients with CGRP(R) antibody treatment were compared with 961 patients prescribed nonspecific oral migraine preventive medicines (amitriptyline, betablocker, flunarizine, topiramate) from the DMKG Headache Registry. Results: Patients with CGRP(R) antibodies had more prior preventive therapies that were insufficiently effective or tolerated compared to patients prescribed nonspecific oral preventive medicines (p < 0.001). Moreover, they had longer disease duration (p < 0.001), more often suffered from chronic migraine (p = 0.002), had more severe headache days (p = 0.004) and acute medication days (p = 0.04), lower quality of life (p < 0.05), more comorbidities (p = 0.001), and fewer of them were working (p < 0.001). After change of insurance coverage, treatment with erenumab shifted towards less refractory patients (p < 0.001) with shorter disease duration (p < 0.001), who were less severely affected compared to patients with other CGRP(R) antibodies (e.g., headache days p = 0.01; disability p = 0.005). Conclusion: CGRP(R) antibodies are prescribed for to patients affected by exceedingly severe migraine. Insurance coverage has a significant effect on use of medicines for migraine prevention.

Details

OriginalspracheDeutsch
FachzeitschriftSchmerz
PublikationsstatusElektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung - 11 Sept. 2025
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 40932510

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • CGRP antibody, Insurance coverage, Migraine, Migraine prevention, Prior treatments