Uncertainty is associated with increased selective attention and sustained stimulus processing

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • R. Dieterich - , Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (Autor:in)
  • T. Endrass - , Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Autor:in)
  • N. Kathmann - , Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (Autor:in)

Abstract

Uncertainty about future threat has been found to be associated with an overestimation of threat probability and is hypothesized to elicit additional allocation of attention. We used event-related potentials to examine uncertainty-related dynamics in attentional allocation, exploiting brain potentials’ high temporal resolution and sensitivity to attention. Thirty participants performed a picture-viewing task in which cues indicated the subsequent picture valence. A certain-neutral and a certain-aversive cue accurately predicted subsequent picture valence, whereas an uncertain cue did not. Participants overestimated the effective frequency of aversive pictures following the uncertain cue, both during and after the task, signifying expectancy and covariation biases, and they tended to express lower subjective valences for aversive pictures presented after the uncertain cue. Pictures elicited increased P2 and LPP amplitudes when their valence could not be predicted from the cue. For the LPP, this effect was more pronounced in response to neutral pictures. Uncertainty appears to enhance the engagement of early phasic and sustained attention for uncertainly cued targets. Thus, defensive motivation related to uncertainty about future threat elicits specific attentional dynamics implicating prioritization at various processing stages, especially for nonthreatening stimuli that tend to violate expectations.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)447-456
Seitenumfang10
FachzeitschriftCognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
Jahrgang16
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2016
Peer-Review-StatusJa
Extern publiziertJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 84955279705
ORCID /0000-0002-8845-8803/work/161406414

Schlagworte