OBJECTIVES: Several thoracic incisions have been described and different techniques used for cardiopulmonary bypass, myocardial protection, and valve exposure in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the early outcomes of patients operated using a simplified minimally invasive approach through a right transaxillary (TAxA) access with those achieved with conventional full sternotomy (FS) operations.

METHODS: Prospectively collected data of patients who underwent mitral valve surgery between 2017 and 2022 at 2 academic centres were reviewed. Among them, 454 patients were operated through minimally invasive mitral valve surgery TAxA access and 667 patients through FS; associated aortic and coronary arteries surgery (CABG) procedures, infective endocarditis, redo and urgent operations were excluded. A propensity-matched analysis was performed using 17 preoperative variables.

RESULTS: Two well-balanced cohorts including a total of 804 patients were analysed. The rate of mitral valve repair was similar in both groups. Operative times were shorter in the FS group; nevertheless, in patients operated with a minimally invasive approach, there was a trend towards decreasing cross-clamp time over the study period (P = 0.07). In the TAxA group, 30-day mortality was 0.25%, and postoperative cerebral stroke rate was 0.7%. TAxA mitral surgery was associated with shorter intubation time (P < 0.001) and intensive care unit stay (P < 0.001). After a median hospital stay of 8 days, 30% of patients who had TAxA surgery were discharged home versus 5% in the FS group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: When compared with FS access, TAxA approach provides at least similar excellent early outcomes in terms of perioperative morbidity and mortality and allows shorter mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit and postoperative hospital stay with a higher rate of patients able to be discharged home without any further period of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.