Time estimation and arousal responses in dopa-responsive dystonia

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Leonie F. Becker - , Universität zu Lübeck (Autor:in)
  • Sinem Tunc - , Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck (Autor:in)
  • Peter Murphy - , Universität Hamburg, Trinity College Dublin, Bernstein Center Computational Neuroscience Berlin (Autor:in)
  • Tobias Bäumer - , Universität zu Lübeck (Autor:in)
  • Anne Weissbach - , Universität zu Lübeck (Autor:in)
  • Martje G. Pauly - , Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck (Autor:in)
  • Duha M. Al-Shorafat - , University of Toronto, Jordan University of Science and Technology (Autor:in)
  • Gerard Saranza - , University of Toronto, Chong Hua Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Anthony E. Lang - , University of Toronto (Autor:in)
  • Christian Beste - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie (Autor:in)
  • Tobias H. Donner - , Universität Hamburg (Autor:in)
  • Julius Verrel - , Universität zu Lübeck (Autor:in)
  • Alexander Münchau - , Universität zu Lübeck (Autor:in)

Abstract

Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) is caused by an impaired dopamine biosynthesis due to a GTP-cyclohydrolase-1 (GCH1) deficiency, resulting in a combination of dystonia and parkinsonism. However, the effect of GCH1 mutations and levodopa treatment on motor control beyond simple movements, such as timing, action preparation and feedback processing, have not been investigated so far. In an active time estimation task with trial-by-trial feedback, participants indicated a target interval (1200 ms) by a motor response. We compared 12 patients tested (in fixed order) under their current levodopa medication ("ON") and after levodopa withdrawal ("OFF") to matched healthy controls (HC), measured twice to control for repetition effects. We assessed time estimation accuracy, trial-to-trial adjustment, as well as task- and feedback-related pupil-linked arousal responses. Patients showed comparable time estimation accuracy ON medication as HC but reduced performance OFF medication. Task-related pupil responses showed the reverse pattern. Trial-to-trial adjustments of response times were reduced in DRD, particularly OFF medication. Our results indicate differential alterations of time estimation accuracy and task-related arousal dynamics in DRD patients as a function of dopaminergic medication state. A medication-independent alteration of task repetition effects in DRD cannot be ruled out with certainty but is discussed as less likely.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer14279
FachzeitschriftScientific reports
Jahrgang12
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 22 Aug. 2022
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 35995805
ORCID /0000-0002-2989-9561/work/160952420

Schlagworte