The multiple-mechanisms hypothesis of biodiversity–stability relationships

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Nico Eisenhauer - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)
  • Kevin Mueller - , Cleveland State University (Autor:in)
  • Anne Ebeling - , Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)
  • Gerd Gleixner - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Autor:in)
  • Yuanyuan Huang - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)
  • Anna Maria Madaj - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)
  • Christiane Roscher - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Alexandra Weigelt - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)
  • Michael Bahn - , Universität Innsbruck (Autor:in)
  • Michael Bonkowski - , Universität zu Köln (Autor:in)
  • Ulrich Brose - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)
  • Simone Cesarz - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)
  • Hannes Feilhauer - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Claudia Guimaraes-Steinicke - , Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Universität Leipzig, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Anna Heintz-Buschart - , University of Amsterdam (Autor:in)
  • Jes Hines - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)
  • Markus Lange - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Autor:in)
  • Sebastian T. Meyer - , Technische Universität München (Autor:in)
  • Neha Mohanbabu - , University of Minnesota System (Autor:in)
  • Liesje Mommer - , Wageningen University & Research (WUR) (Autor:in)
  • Sigrid Neuhauser - , Universität Innsbruck (Autor:in)
  • Yvonne Oelmann - , Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (Autor:in)
  • Soroor Rahmanian - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Takehiro Sasaki - , Universität Leipzig, Yokohama National University, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Autor:in)
  • Stefan Scheu - , Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Autor:in)
  • Holger Schielzeth - , Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)
  • Bernhard Schmid - , Universität Zürich (Autor:in)
  • Michael Schloter - , Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Technische Universität München (Autor:in)
  • Stefanie Schulz - , Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis (Autor:in)
  • Sybille B. Unsicker - , Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (CAU) (Autor:in)
  • Cordula Vogel - , Professur für Bodenressourcen und Landnutzung (Autor:in)
  • Wolfgang W. Weisser - , Technische Universität München (Autor:in)
  • Forest Isbell - , University of Minnesota System (Autor:in)

Abstract

Long-term research in grassland biodiversity experiments has provided empirical evidence that ecological and evolutionary processes are intertwined in determining both biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) and biodiversity–stability relationships. Focusing on plant diversity, we hypothesize that multifunctional stability is highest in high-diversity plant communities and that biodiversity–stability relationships increase over time due to a variety of forms of ecological complementarity including the interaction with other biota above and below ground. We introduce the multiple-mechanisms hypothesis of biodiversity–stability relationships suggesting that it is not an individual mechanism that drives long-term biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and stability but that several intertwined processes produce increasingly positive ecosystem effects. The following six mechanisms are important. Low-diversity plant communities accumulate more plant antagonists over time (1), and use resources less efficiently and have more open, leaky nutrient cycles (2). Conversely, high-diversity plant communities support a greater diversity and activity of beneficial interaction partners across trophic levels (3); diversify in their traits over time and space, within and across species, to optimize temporal (intra- and interannual) and spatial complementarity (4), create a more stable microclimate (5), and foster higher top-down control of aboveground and belowground herbivores by predators (6). In line with the observation that different species play unique roles in ecosystems that are dynamic and multifaceted, the particular mechanism contributing most to the higher performance and stability of diverse plant communities might differ across ecosystem functions, years, locations, and environmental change scenarios. This indicates “between-context insurance” or “across-context complementarity” of different mechanisms. We introduce examples of experiments that will be conducted to test our hypotheses and which might inspire additional work.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)153-166
Seitenumfang14
FachzeitschriftBasic and applied ecology
Jahrgang79
Frühes Online-Datum20 Juli 2024
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Sept. 2024
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0002-6525-2634/work/167215331

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Biodiversity change, Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning, Complementarity, Recovery, Resilience, Resistance