The Lipidomic Profile Discriminates Between MASLD and MetALD

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Kai Markus Schneider - , Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Else Kröner Fresenius Zentrum für Digitale Gesundheit, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Feng Cao - , Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Helen Ye Rim Huang - , Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Lanlan Chen - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Autor:in)
  • Yazhou Chen - , Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Rongpeng Gong - , Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Anastasia Raptis - , Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Kate Townsend Creasy - , University of Pennsylvania (Autor:in)
  • Jan Clusmann - , Else Kröner Fresenius Zentrum für Digitale Gesundheit, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Felix van Haag - , Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Paul Henry Koop - , Universitätsklinikum Aachen (Autor:in)
  • Adrien Guillot - , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Autor:in)
  • Tom Luedde - , Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Rohit Loomba - , University of California at San Diego (Autor:in)
  • Sven Francque - , University of Antwerp (Autor:in)
  • Carolin Victoria Schneider - , Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine (Autor:in)

Abstract

Background: The recent consensus statement redefined steatotic liver diseases. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related liver disease (MetALD) now represent distinct disease entities. However, biomarkers that differentiate MASLD and MetALD remain largely unknown. Aims: To identify lipidomic biomarkers with discriminatory potential for distinguishing MetALD from MASLD. Methods: Using the UK Biobank dataset, 40,534 people with available MRI liver scans were analysed. A total of, 11,217 cases with a proton density fat fraction (PDFF) ≥ 5% were identified as having steatotic liver disease. Among these, lipidomic profiles were obtained for 5539 MASLD and 462 MetALD cases. A total of, 250 plasma lipidomic and metabolomic parameters were analysed. Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis was used to confirm the association between alcohol consumption and the lipidomic biomarkers. Results: When comparing the top 30 differentially expressed lipidomic biomarkers predicting MetALD compared to MASLD, the majority were related to HDL and were significantly overrepresented at both analysed time points. The top five metabolites were: acetoacetate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, phospholipids in Large HDL, concentration of large HDL particles, free cholesterol in large HDL. The sensitivity analysis comparing alcohol-related liver disease to MASLD revealed similar associations, suggesting that the HDL signature is stable over time. Additionally, MR analysis further confirmed that alcohol consumption was associated with increased levels of HDL-related metabolites. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that HDL-centric lipidomic markers, particularly those within the larger and medium HDL subfraction, may differentiate MetALD from MASLD. Further longitudinal and experimental studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess their clinical implications.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1357-1371
Seitenumfang15
FachzeitschriftAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Jahrgang61
Ausgabenummer8
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Apr. 2025
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 39935287

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • ethanol metabolism, HDL, Lipidomics, liver disease, MASLD, MetALD, proton density fat fraction, UK biobank