The German version of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): psychometric properties and diagnostic utility

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Antje Krüger-Gottschalk - , Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (Autor:in)
  • Christine Knaevelsrud - , Freie Universität (FU) Berlin (Autor:in)
  • Heinrich Rau - , Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin (Autor:in)
  • Anne Dyer - , Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Ingo Schäfer - , Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) (Autor:in)
  • Julia Schellong - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Biotechnologisches Zentrum (BIOTEC) (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Ehring - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL, now PCL-5) has recently been revised to reflect the new diagnostic criteria of the disorder.

METHODS: A clinical sample of trauma-exposed individuals (N = 352) was assessed with the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and the PCL-5. Internal consistencies and test-retest reliability were computed. To investigate diagnostic accuracy, we calculated receiver operating curves. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed to analyze the structural validity.

RESULTS: Results showed high internal consistency (α = .95), high test-retest reliability (r = .91) and a high correlation with the total severity score of the CAPS-5, r = .77. In addition, the recommended cutoff of 33 on the PCL-5 showed high diagnostic accuracy when compared to the diagnosis established by the CAPS-5. CFAs comparing the DSM-5 model with alternative models (the three-factor solution, the dysphoria, anhedonia, externalizing behavior and hybrid model) to account for the structural validity of the PCL-5 remained inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings show that the German PCL-5 is a reliable instrument with good diagnostic accuracy. However, more research evaluating the underlying factor structure is needed.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer379
FachzeitschriftBMC Psychiatry
Jahrgang17
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 28 Nov. 2017
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 29183285
PubMedCentral PMC5704375
Scopus 85035318527

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anhedonia, Checklist/standards, Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis, Translations, Young Adult