The Effects of Clinical Pathways on Professional Practice, Patient Outcomes, Length of Stay, and Hospital Costs: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsartikel (Review)BeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Thomas Rotter - , Maastricht University (Autor:in)
  • Leigh Kinsman - , Monash University (Autor:in)
  • Erica James - , Cancer Council NSW (Autor:in)
  • Andreas Machotta - , Erasmus University Rotterdam (Autor:in)
  • Jon Willis - , La Trobe University (Autor:in)
  • Pamela Snow - , Monash University (Autor:in)
  • Joachim Kugler - , Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin (Autor:in)

Abstract

This paper is a summary version of the previously published Cochrane review. It may increase the reach of the topic to health researchers and practitioners and encourage further discussion. The systematic review aims to summarize the evidence and assess the effect of clinical pathways on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs. The authors searched the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, NHS EED, and Global Health. Twenty-seven studies considering a total of 11,398 participants were included for analysis. The main results were a reduction in in-hospital complications (odds ratio 0.58: 95% CI [0.36, 0.94] and improved documentation (odds ratio 11.95: 95% CI [4.72, 30.30]) associated with clinical pathways. Considerable variation in study design and settings prevented statistical pooling of results for length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs. The authors concluded that clinical pathways are associated with reduced in-hospital complications and improved documentation.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)3-27
Seitenumfang25
Fachzeitschrift Evaluation & the health professions
Jahrgang35
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - März 2012
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Schlagwörter

  • clinical pathways, cochrane systematic review, hospitals, meta analysis, patient outcomes