Tailored Immunotherapy Approach With Nivolumab in Advanced Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Marc Oliver Grimm - , Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)
  • Bernd Jürgen Schmitz-Dräger - , St. Theresien-Krankenhaus Nürnberg gGmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (Autor:in)
  • Uwe Zimmermann - , Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald (Autor:in)
  • Christine Barbara Grün - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Gustavo Bruno Baretton - , Institut für Pathologie, Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Marc Schmitz - , Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden, Hochschulmedizin (Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum), Institut für Immunologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Susan Foller - , Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)
  • Katharina Leucht - , Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)
  • Martin Schostak - , Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Autor:in)
  • Friedemann Zengerling - , Universität Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Ulrike Schumacher - , Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)
  • Wolfgang Loidl - , Linz Hospital Elisabethinen (Autor:in)
  • Johannes Meran - , Barmherzigen Brüder Krankenhaus Salzburg (Autor:in)

Abstract

PURPOSESeveral anti-programmed cell death (ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved in advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Recently, improved activity of an anti-PD-1/anticytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (CTLA-4) combination versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy has been reported. We report a response-based approach starting treatment with nivolumab monotherapy with nivolumab/ipilimumab as immunotherapeutic boost.METHODSAfter four doses of nivolumab induction, responders continued with nivolumab maintenance therapy. Patients with stable/progressive disease received nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 2 doses followed by nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 2 doses, if not responding to the initial boost. Responders to boosts continued with nivolumab maintenance. Between July 2017 and April 2019, 86 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up is 7.7 months. The primary end point is objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Secondary end points include efficacy of nivolumab induction, remission rate with nivolumab/ipilimumab boosts, overall survival, and safety.RESULTSOf all patients, 42, 39, and five were first- (1L), second- (2L), and third-line (3L), respectively. The median age was 68 years. The ORR with nivolumab monotherapy (assessed at week 8) was 29% in 1L and 23% in 2/3L, respectively. Forty-one patients received early (week 8) and 11 received later nivolumab/ipilimumab boosts. ORRs with nivolumab with or without nivolumab/ipilimumab (best overall response) were 45% and 27% in 1L and 2/3L, respectively. In 1L, 7 of 17 patients receiving boosts at week 8 improved, compared with 2 of 24 in 2/3L.CONCLUSIONThe tailored approach of TITAN-TCC shows meaningful clinical activity supporting dual checkpoint inhibition in 1L mUC. However, starting therapy with nivolumab exclusively appears inadequate given the aggressive nature of mUC. In 2/3L, nivolumab/ipilimumab boosts with escalating ipilimumab dose did not improve efficacy outcomes versus nivolumab monotherapy. An independent 2L cohort of TITAN-TCC receiving nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 4 doses is ongoing.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)2128-2137
Seitenumfang10
FachzeitschriftJournal of clinical oncology
Jahrgang40
Ausgabenummer19
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Juli 2022
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 35275706