Sequential BCMA CAR T-cell therapy in refractory multiple myeloma

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Tim Richardson - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Udo Holtick - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Jan-Hendrik Frenking - , Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Hishan Tharmaseelan - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Hyatt Balke-Want - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Ruth Flümann - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Elias Karl Mai - , Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Sandra Sauer - , Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Raphael Teipel - , Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Malte von Bonin - , Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Michael Hallek - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Christof Scheid - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Philipp Gödel - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing after B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment remains a therapeutic challenge. Data on re-exposure to CAR T-cell therapy targeting the same antigen are scarce. We analyzed 10 heavily pretreated patients with RRMM at 3 medical centers treated with the commercially approved CAR T-cell therapy product idecabtagene vicleucel in a real-world setting. Upon relapse, all patients received ciltacabtagene autoleucel as a second CAR T-cell therapy infusion, with bridging treatments permitted between both therapies. Sequential therapy with BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy was safe, with no higher-grade immune-cell-associated side effects or new safety signals. We found robust CAR T-cell therapy expansion and high response rates (100% with at least very good partial response, with 60% achieving minimal residual disease negativity), with an estimated progression-free survival of 64.8% (95% confidence interval, 39%-100%) at 6 months after the second CAR T-cell treatment. Duration of response to first CAR T-cell therapy was predictive for durable responses to the second CAR T-cell therapy product. Loss of BCMA antigen occurred in only 1 of 3 patients relapsing after ciltacabtagene autoleucel. Two of three relapsing patients died within a year, and showed no further response to bispecific antibody treatment. To our knowledge, this study provides the first real-world evidence that sequential treatment with 2 different commercially approved BCMA CAR T-cell therapy products is both feasible and effective, particularly in patients with prolonged responses to initial BCMA CAR T-cell therapy.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)4624-4630
Seitenumfang7
FachzeitschriftBlood advances
Jahrgang9
Ausgabenummer18
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 23 Sept. 2025
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMedCentral PMC12455134
Scopus 105015731172

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Humans, Multiple Myeloma/therapy, B-Cell Maturation Antigen/immunology, Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods, Middle Aged, Male, Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/immunology, Aged, Female, Treatment Outcome, Adult