SAGES consensus recommendations on surgical video data use, structure, and exploration (for research in artificial intelligence, clinical quality improvement, and surgical education)

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Jennifer A Eckhoff - , Massachusetts General Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Guy Rosman - , Massachusetts General Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Maria S Altieri - , Stony Brook University Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Stefanie Speidel - , Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (Partner: UKD, MFD, HZDR, DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Danail Stoyanov - , Heythrop College, University of London (Autor:in)
  • Mehran Anvari - , McMaster University (Autor:in)
  • Lena Meier-Hein - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Keno März - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Pierre Jannin - , University of Rennes - Campus Beaulieu (Autor:in)
  • Carla Pugh - , Stanford Medicine (Autor:in)
  • Martin Wagner - , Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Elan Witkowski - , Massachusetts General Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Paresh Shaw - , New York University Langone Health (Autor:in)
  • Amin Madani - , University Health Network (UHN) (Autor:in)
  • Yutong Ban - , Massachusetts General Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Ward - , Massachusetts General Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Filippo Filicori - , Lenox Hill Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Nicolas Padoy - , Institute of Image-Guided Surgery (Autor:in)
  • Mark Talamini - , Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (Autor:in)
  • Ozanan R Meireles - , Massachusetts General Hospital (Autor:in)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery generates a vast amount of data from each procedure. Particularly video data provides significant value for surgical research, clinical outcome assessment, quality control, and education. The data lifecycle is influenced by various factors, including data structure, acquisition, storage, and sharing; data use and exploration, and finally data governance, which encompasses all ethical and legal regulations associated with the data. There is a universal need among stakeholders in surgical data science to establish standardized frameworks that address all aspects of this lifecycle to ensure data quality and purpose.

METHODS: Working groups were formed, among 48 representatives from academia and industry, including clinicians, computer scientists and industry representatives. These working groups focused on: Data Use, Data Structure, Data Exploration, and Data Governance. After working group and panel discussions, a modified Delphi process was conducted.

RESULTS: The resulting Delphi consensus provides conceptualized and structured recommendations for each domain related to surgical video data. We identified the key stakeholders within the data lifecycle and formulated comprehensive, easily understandable, and widely applicable guidelines for data utilization. Standardization of data structure should encompass format and quality, data sources, documentation, metadata, and account for biases within the data. To foster scientific data exploration, datasets should reflect diversity and remain adaptable to future applications. Data governance must be transparent to all stakeholders, addressing legal and ethical considerations surrounding the data.

CONCLUSION: This consensus presents essential recommendations around the generation of standardized and diverse surgical video databanks, accounting for multiple stakeholders involved in data generation and use throughout its lifecycle. Following the SAGES annotation framework, we lay the foundation for standardization of data use, structure, and exploration. A detailed exploration of requirements for adequate data governance will follow.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)8690-8707
Seitenumfang18
FachzeitschriftSurgical endoscopy
Jahrgang37
Ausgabenummer11
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Nov. 2023
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMedCentral PMC10616217
Scopus 85175110726

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Humans, Consensus, Artificial Intelligence, Quality Improvement, Data Collection