Reviews and syntheses: Turning the challenges of partitioning ecosystem evaporation and transpiration into opportunities

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Paul C. Stoy - , University of Wisconsin-Madison, Montana State University (Autor:in)
  • Tarek S. El-Madany - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Autor:in)
  • Joshua B. Fisher - , Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, University of California at Los Angeles (Autor:in)
  • Pierre Gentine - , Columbia University (Autor:in)
  • Tobias Gerken - , Pennsylvania State University (Autor:in)
  • Stephen P. Good - , Oregon State University (Autor:in)
  • Anne Klosterhalfen - , Forschungszentrum Jülich (Autor:in)
  • Shuguang Liu - , Central South University of Forestry & Technology (Autor:in)
  • Diego G. Miralles - , Ghent University (Autor:in)
  • Oscar Perez-Priego - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Macquarie University (Autor:in)
  • Angela J. Rigden - , Harvard University (Autor:in)
  • Todd H. Skaggs - , United States Department of Agriculture (Autor:in)
  • Georg Wohlfahrt - , University of Innsbruck (Autor:in)
  • Ray G. Anderson - , United States Department of Agriculture (Autor:in)
  • A. Miriam J. Coenders-Gerrits - , Technische Universität Delft (Autor:in)
  • Martin Jung - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Autor:in)
  • Wouter H. Maes - , Ghent University (Autor:in)
  • Ivan Mammarella - , University of Helsinki (Autor:in)
  • Matthias Mauder - , Professur für Meteorologie, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (Autor:in)
  • Mirco Migliavacca - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Autor:in)
  • Jacob A. Nelson - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Autor:in)
  • Rafael Poyatos - , CREAF - Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications, Ghent University (Autor:in)
  • Markus Reichstein - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Autor:in)
  • Russell L. Scott - , United States Department of Agriculture (Autor:in)
  • Sebastian Wolf - , ETH Zurich (Autor:in)

Abstract

Evaporation (E) and transpiration (T) respond differently to ongoing changes in climate, atmospheric composition, and land use. It is difficult to partition ecosystem-scale evapotranspiration (ET) measurements into E and T, which makes it difficult to validate satellite data and land surface models. Here, we review current progress in partitioning E and T and provide a prospectus for how to improve theory and observations going forward. Recent advancements in analytical techniques create new opportunities for partitioning E and T at the ecosystem scale, but their assumptions have yet to be fully tested. For example, many approaches to partition E and T rely on the notion that plant canopy conductance and ecosystem water use efficiency exhibit optimal responses to atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (D). We use observations from 240 eddy covariance flux towers to demonstrate that optimal ecosystem response to D is a reasonable assumption, in agreement with recent studies, but more analysis is necessary to determine the conditions for which this assumption holds. Another critical assumption for many partitioning approaches is that ET can be approximated as T during ideal transpiring conditions, which has been challenged by observational studies. We demonstrate that T can exceed 95 % of ET from certain ecosystems, but other ecosystems do not appear to reach this value, which suggests that this assumption is ecosystem-dependent with implications for partitioning. It is important to further improve approaches for partitioning E and T, yet few multi-method comparisons have been undertaken to date. Advances in our understanding of carbon-water coupling at the stomatal, leaf, and canopy level open new perspectives on how to quantify T via its strong coupling with photosynthesis. Photosynthesis can be constrained at the ecosystem and global scales with emerging data sources including solar-induced fluorescence, carbonyl sulfide flux measurements, thermography, and more. Such comparisons would improve our mechanistic understanding of ecosystem water fluxes and provide the observations necessary to validate remote sensing algorithms and land surface models to understand the changing global water cycle.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)3747-3775
Seitenumfang29
FachzeitschriftBiogeosciences
Jahrgang16
Ausgabenummer19
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Okt. 2019
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0002-8789-163X/work/163766112