Rethinking EDSS-based ambulation assessment in multiple sclerosis using continuous variable monitoring

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Noah M Werner - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Sauerlandklinik Hachen gGmbH (Autor:in)
  • Melanie Schuette - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Ramona Hagler - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Jan Voth - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Balázs Danajka - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Patricia Kirschner - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Markus Heibel - , Sauerlandklinik Hachen gGmbH (Autor:in)
  • Tjalf Ziemssen - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Uwe K Zettl - , Universitätsmedizin Rostock (Autor:in)
  • Sven G Meuth - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Marc Pawlitzki - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf (Autor:in)
  • Lars Masanneck - , Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Hasso-Plattner-Institut (Autor:in)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by relapses and progressive disability. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), used to quantify disability, is based on single, discretely assessed and potentially inaccurate patient-estimated walking ability, whereas digital health technologies (DHTs) enable continuous activity monitoring and more objective assessment of real-world functional performance.

METHODS: In this prospective observational study conducted at two German centers, patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) underwent clinical assessments at baseline (V1) and study completion (V2). Walking distance and step counts were measured using a measuring wheel and pedometer, while continuous physical activity was assessed via smartwatch-derived metrics.

RESULTS: Sixteen patients with RRMS were included (median age 57.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 49.25-63.25]; median EDSS 4.5 [IQR 3.5-6]). Patient-estimated walking distance at V1 showed moderate correlation with clinically measured distance (Spearman's ρ = 0.60, p = 0.013), with 12 of 16 patients misjudging distances relative to EDSS thresholds. Walking distance showed intra-individual variability between V1 and V2 (median absolute difference: 113.6 m). Median daily walking distance (ρ = -0.61, p = 0.0123), step count (ρ = -0.64, p = 0.0082), and peak steps (ρ = -0.69, p = 0.0032) correlated negatively with EDSS.

CONCLUSION: Patient-estimated maximum walking distance demonstrated moderate agreement with clinical performance and frequently crossed EDSS thresholds, while clinical assessments varied substantially within individuals over the short study duration, underscoring the limitations of single evaluations. In contrast, smartwatch-derived metrics aligned with clinical measures, reflected EDSS scores, and captured real-world mobility.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer47
FachzeitschriftNeurological research and practice
Jahrgang8
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 12 Juni 2026
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0001-8799-8202/work/218583463
Scopus 105041823942

Schlagworte