Reinforcement learning or active inference?

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Karl J. Friston - , University College London (Autor:in)
  • Jean Daunizeau - , University College London (Autor:in)
  • Stefan J. Kiebel - , University College London (Autor:in)

Abstract

This paper questions the need for reinforcement learning or control theory when optimising behaviour. We show that it is fairly simple to teach an agent complicated and adaptive behaviours using a free-energy formulation of perception. In this formulation, agents adjust their internal states and sampling of the environment to minimize their free-energy. Such agents learn causal structure in the environment and sample it in an adaptive and self-supervised fashion. This results in behavioural policies that reproduce those optimised by reinforcement learning and dynamic programming. Critically, we do not need to invoke the notion of reward, value or utility. We illustrate these points by solving a benchmark problem in dynamic programming; namely the mountain-car problem, using active perception or inference under the free-energy principle. The ensuing proof-of-concept may be important because the free-energy formulation furnishes a unified account of both action and perception and may speak to a reappraisal of the role of dopamine in the brain.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummere6421
FachzeitschriftPloS one
Jahrgang4
Ausgabenummer7
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 29 Juli 2009
Peer-Review-StatusJa
Extern publiziertJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 19641614

Schlagworte

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Bibliotheksschlagworte