Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsartikel (Review)BeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Carlos Ramirez-Reyes - , University of Minnesota System (Autor:in)
  • Kate A. Brauman - , University of Minnesota System (Autor:in)
  • Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer - , Stanford University (Autor:in)
  • Gillian L. Galford - , University of Vermont (Autor:in)
  • Susana B. Adamo - , Columbia University (Autor:in)
  • Christopher B. Anderson - , Stanford University (Autor:in)
  • Clarissa Anderson - , University of California at San Diego (Autor:in)
  • Ginger R.H. Allington - , George Washington University (GWU) (Autor:in)
  • Kenneth J. Bagstad - , United States Geological Survey (Autor:in)
  • Michael T. Coe - , Woods Hole Research Center (Autor:in)
  • Anna F. Cord - , Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Laura E. Dee - , University of Minnesota System (Autor:in)
  • Rachelle K. Gould - , University of Vermont (Autor:in)
  • Meha Jain - , University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Autor:in)
  • Virginia A. Kowal - , Stanford University (Autor:in)
  • Frank E. Muller-Karger - , University of South Florida (Autor:in)
  • Jessica Norriss - , Upstream Tech (Autor:in)
  • Peter Potapov - , University of Maryland, College Park (Autor:in)
  • Jiangxiao Qiu - , University of Florida (Autor:in)
  • Jesse T. Rieb - , McGill University (Autor:in)
  • Brian E. Robinson - , McGill University (Autor:in)
  • Leah H. Samberg - , University of Minnesota System, Rainforest Alliance (Autor:in)
  • Nagendra Singh - , Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Autor:in)
  • Sabrina H. Szeto - , Yale University (Autor:in)
  • Brian Voigt - , University of Vermont (Autor:in)
  • Keri Watson - , Sewanee: The University of the South (Autor:in)
  • T. Maxwell Wright - , Conservation International (Autor:in)

Abstract

The benefits nature provides to people, called ecosystem services, are increasingly recognized and accounted for in assessments of infrastructure development, agricultural management, conservation prioritization, and sustainable sourcing. These assessments are often limited by data, however, a gap with tremendous potential to be filled through Earth observations (EO), which produce a variety of data across spatial and temporal extents and resolutions. Despite widespread recognition of this potential, in practice few ecosystem service studies use EO. Here, we identify challenges and opportunities to using EO in ecosystem service modeling and assessment. Some challenges are technical, related to data awareness, processing, and access. These challenges require systematic investment in model platforms and data management. Other challenges are more conceptual but still systemic; they are byproducts of the structure of existing ecosystem service models and addressing them requires scientific investment in solutions and tools applicable to a wide range of models and approaches. We also highlight new ways in which EO can be leveraged for ecosystem service assessments, identifying promising new areas of research. More widespread use of EO for ecosystem service assessment will only be achieved if all of these types of challenges are addressed. This will require non-traditional funding and partnering opportunities from private and public agencies to promote data exploration, sharing, and archiving. Investing in this integration will be reflected in better and more accurate ecosystem service assessments worldwide.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1053-1063
Seitenumfang11
FachzeitschriftScience of the total environment
Jahrgang665
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15 Mai 2019
Peer-Review-StatusJa
Extern publiziertJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 30893737

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • Ecosystem benefits, Monitoring, Remote sensing, Research priorities