Randomized clinical trial of BioFoam® Surgical Matrix to achieve hemostasis after liver resection

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Nuh N. Rahbari - , Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie (Autor:in)
  • Emrullah Birgin - , Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Dorothée Sturm - , Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Uta Schwanebeck - , Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Jürgen Weitz - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral- Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Christoph Reissfelder - , Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie (Autor:in)

Abstract

Background: Topical agents were designed to facilitate hemostasis during hepatic resection. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BioFoam® Surgical Matrix for achieving hemostasis after open hepatic resection. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized controlled monocentric trial of patients undergoing elective open liver resection between December 2015 and September 2017. The primary endpoint was time-to-complete hemostasis. Results: A total of 101 patients were enrolled in this trial, giving 51 patients in the BioFoam® group and 50 patients in the control group (without use of BioFoam®). Time-to-complete hemostasis was significantly reduced in the BioFoam® group (156 ± 129 versus 307 ± 264 s; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative bile leaks (n = 6 (12%) vs. n = 5 (10%); P = 0.776), postoperative morbidity (n = 37 (73%) vs. n = 40 (80%); P = 0.482) or mortality (n = 3 (6%) vs. n = 1 (2%); P = 0.618) between groups. Conclusion: BioFoam® is a safe topical agent for achieving faster hemostasis during hepatic resection, however, the true clinical relevance of this finding needs to be further evaluated. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02612220.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)987-995
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftHPB
Jahrgang22
Ausgabenummer7
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Juli 2020
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 31680010

Schlagworte

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete