Psychische Belastung des intensivmedizinischen Personals in Deutschland im Verlauf der COVID-19-Pandemie. Evidenz aus der VOICE-Studie

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Alexander Niecke - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Michaela Henning - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)
  • Martin Hellmich - , Universität zu Köln (Autor:in)
  • Yesim Erim - , Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (Autor:in)
  • Eva Morawa - , Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (Autor:in)
  • Petra Beschoner - , Universitätsklinikum Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Lucia Jerg-Bretzke - , Universitätsklinikum Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Franziska Geiser - , Universitätsklinikum Bonn (Autor:in)
  • Andreas M Baranowski - , Universitätsklinikum Bonn (Autor:in)
  • Kerstin Weidner - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik (Autor:in)
  • Sabine Mogwitz - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik (Autor:in)
  • Christian Albus - , Universitätsklinikum Köln (Autor:in)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed major challenges to the healthcare system worldwide and led to particular stress among healthcare workers. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the level of global mental stress of direct healthcare workers in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study with four measurement points (T1: 4-5/2020, T2:11/2020-1/2021, 5-7/2021, 2-5/2022), psychological distress symptoms were recorded in an online survey with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) among hospital staff working in direct patient care (N = 5408 datasets). The total dataset was exploratively analyzed according to field of activity, gender, and professional group affiliation.

RESULTS: Clinically relevant psychological distress (PHQ-4 ≥ 5) was present in 29.3% (n = 419/1429) of intensive care staff. A comparison of the four cross-sectional surveys showed a significant increase in the rate of clinically relevant mental distress in the first pandemic year (23.2% at T1 vs. 30.6% at T2; p < 0.01), which stabilized at a high level in the second pandemic year (33.6% at T3 and 32.0% at T4). Women did not differ from men in this respect (n = 280/919, 30.4% vs. n = 139/508, 27.4%; p = 0.74). Nursing staff were significantly more often psychologically stressed than physicians (n = 339/1105, 30.7% vs. n = 80/324, 24.7%; p = 0.03). Intensive care staff did not show significantly higher stress than staff working in nonintensive care areas (n = 419/1429, 29.3% vs. n = 1149/3979, 28.7%, p = 0.21).

CONCLUSION: German healthcare workers reported high levels of mental distress during the pandemic, which increased during the course of the pandemic, but no significant difference was found between intensive care and nonintensive care staff in our sample. This may be due to the fact that the pandemic in Germany was comparatively moderate internationally and neither a collapse of the healthcare system in general nor a collapse of intensive care structures in particular took place.

Details

OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)300–306
Seitenumfang7
FachzeitschriftMedizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin
Jahrgang120
Ausgabenummer4
Frühes Online-Datum7 Aug. 2024
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2024
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 85200551584
Mendeley bdab9873-3fe2-3410-8fa8-6f2236c60046

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Healthcare workers, Infectious disease, Intensive care medicine, Mental health, PHQ-4