Protist communities are correlated with abiotic soil factors, but not resources, prey, or predators along a subalpine secondary succession

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Ajuan Zhang - , CAS - Chengdu Institute of Biology, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) (Autor:in)
  • Anton M. Potapov - , Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Universität Leipzig, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Autor:in)
  • Ruyi Luo - , CAS - Chengdu Institute of Biology (Autor:in)
  • Yan Zhang - , CAS - Chengdu Institute of Biology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Autor:in)
  • Wei Qiang - , CAS - Chengdu Institute of Biology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) (Autor:in)
  • Bing Liu - , CAS - Chengdu Institute of Biology, University of York (Autor:in)
  • Xueyong Pang - , CAS - Chengdu Institute of Biology (Autor:in)

Abstract

Protists are pivotal components of soil micro-food webs, influencing microbial functioning and nutrient cycling. While abiotic soil factors consistently drive protist communities, the roles of bottom-up (resources) and top-down (predators) forces remain understudied. The lack of integrative studies on these drivers constrains our understanding of changes in protistan communities. To fill this gap, we investigated a subalpine succession (grassland, shrubland, secondary forest, primary forest) in southwestern China, using 18S rRNA gene sequencing to assess protist communities. We specifically tested how basal plant resources, food web components, and abiotic soil factors shape protist communities and their functional groups (phagotrophic, parasitic, phototrophic). The results showed that overall protist diversity decreased during secondary succession, being lowest in secondary birch forests. Abiotic soil factors, especially soil moisture, total phosphorus, and pH, were strongly correlated with protist community composition, while plant resources, prey, and predators showed weaker associations, except for parasitic protists, which were also associated with plant resources and invertebrate diversity. The community composition of phagotrophic and parasitic protists exhibited more pronounced changes along the succession compared to phototrophic protists. Our findings highlight the dominant role of abiotic soil factors in shaping protist communities, which may lead to a decoupling of above- (plant) and belowground (protist) diversity patterns. Moreover, higher trophic levels within protist communities showed greater sensitivity to succession, indicating functional restructuring in soil micro-food webs during ecosystem development. This integrative perspective enhances our understanding of soil protist communities, highlighting the interactions between abiotic and biotic factors that shape belowground ecosystems across environmental gradients.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer117310
FachzeitschriftGeoderma
Jahrgang458
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Juni 2025
Peer-Review-StatusJa
Extern publiziertJa

Schlagworte

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Schlagwörter

  • Bottom-up regulation, Functional groups, Secondary succession, Soil protistan communities, Top-down control, Trophic interactions