Phase and amplitude of ecosystem carbon release and uptake potentials as derived from FLUXNET measurements

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Eva Falge - , Universität Bayreuth (Autor:in)
  • John Tenhunen - , Universität Bayreuth (Autor:in)
  • Dennis Baldocchi - , University of California at Berkeley (Autor:in)
  • Marc Aubinet - , University of Liege (Autor:in)
  • Peter Bakwin - , National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Autor:in)
  • Paul Berbigier - , INRAE- Institut National de La Recherche Agronomique (Autor:in)
  • Christian Bernhofer - , Professur für Meteorologie, Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Jean Marc Bonnefond - , INRAE- Institut National de La Recherche Agronomique (Autor:in)
  • George Burba - , University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Autor:in)
  • Robert Clement - , University of Edinburgh (Autor:in)
  • Kenneth J. Davis - , Pennsylvania State University (Autor:in)
  • Jan A. Elbers - , Wageningen University & Research (WUR) (Autor:in)
  • Matthias Falk - , University of California at Davis (Autor:in)
  • Allen H. Goldstein - , University of California at Berkeley (Autor:in)
  • Achim Grelle - , Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet (Autor:in)
  • André Granier - , INRAE- Institut National de La Recherche Agronomique (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Grünwald - , Professur für Meteorologie, Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Jón Gumundsson - , Agricultural University of Iceland (Autor:in)
  • David Hollinger - , United States Department of Agriculture (Autor:in)
  • Ivan A. Janssens - , University of Antwerp (Autor:in)
  • Petri Keronen - , University of Helsinki (Autor:in)
  • Andrew S. Kowalski - , University of Antwerp (Autor:in)
  • Gabriel Katul - , Duke University (Autor:in)
  • Beverly E. Law - , Oregon State University (Autor:in)
  • Yadvinder Malhi - , University of Edinburgh (Autor:in)
  • Tilden Meyers - , NOAA/ATDD (Autor:in)
  • Russell K. Monson - , University of Colorado Boulder (Autor:in)
  • Eddy Moors - , Wageningen University & Research (WUR) (Autor:in)
  • J. William Munger - , Harvard University (Autor:in)
  • Walt Oechel - , San Diego State University (Autor:in)
  • Kyaw Tha Paw U - , University of California at Davis (Autor:in)
  • Kim Pilegaard - , Technical University of Denmark (Autor:in)
  • Üllar Rannik - , University of Helsinki (Autor:in)
  • Corinna Rebmann - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Autor:in)
  • Andrew Suyker - , University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Autor:in)
  • Halldor Thorgeirsson - , Agricultural University of Iceland (Autor:in)
  • Giampiero Tirone - , Università degli Studi della Tuscia (Autor:in)
  • Andrew Turnipseed - , University of Colorado Boulder (Autor:in)
  • Kell Wilson - , NOAA/ATDD (Autor:in)
  • Steve Wofsy - , Harvard University (Autor:in)

Abstract

As length and timing of the growing season are major factors explaining differences in carbon exchange of ecosystems, we analyzed seasonal patterns of net ecosystem carbon exchange (FNEE) using eddy covariance data of the FLUXNET data base (http://www-eosdis.ornl.gov/FLUXNET). The study included boreal and temperate, deciduous and coniferous forests, Mediterranean evergreen systems, rainforest, native and managed temperate grasslands, tundra, and C3 and C4 crops. Generalization of seasonal patterns are useful for identifying functional vegetation types for global dynamic vegetation models, as well as for global inversion studies, and can help improve phenological modules in SVAT or biogeochemical models. The results of this study have important validation potential for global carbon cycle modeling. The phasing of respiratory and assimilatory capacity differed within forest types: for temperate coniferous forests seasonal uptake and release capacities are in phase, for temperate deciduous and boreal coniferous forests, release was delayed compared to uptake. According to seasonal pattern of maximum nighttime release (evaluated over 15-day periods, Fmax) the study sites can be grouped in four classes: (1) boreal and high altitude conifers and grasslands; (2) temperate deciduous and temperate conifers; (3) tundra and crops; (4) evergreen Mediterranean and tropical forests. Similar results are found for maximum daytime uptake (Fmin) and the integral net carbon flux, but temperate deciduous forests fall into class 1. For forests, seasonal amplitudes of Fmax and Fmin increased in the order tropical < Mediterranean and temperate coniferous < temperate deciduous and boreal forests, and the pattern seems relatively stable for these groups. The seasonal amplitudes of Fmax and Fmin are largest for managed grasslands and crops. Largest observed values of Fmin varied between -48 and -2 μmol m-2 s-1, decreasing in the order C4-crops > C3-crops > temperate deciduous forests > temperate conifers > boreal conifers > tundra ecosystems. Due to data restrictions, our analysis centered mainly on Northern Hemisphere temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Grasslands, crops, Mediterranean ecosystems, and rainforests are under-represented, as are savanna systems, wooded grassland, shrubland, or year-round measurements in tundra systems. For regional or global estimates of carbon sequestration potentials, future investigations of eddy covariance should expand in these systems.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)75-95
Seitenumfang21
FachzeitschriftAgricultural and forest meteorology
Jahrgang113
Ausgabenummer1-4
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2 Dez. 2002
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0003-2263-0073/work/163765976

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • AmeriFlux, Eddy covariance, EUROFLUX, FLUXNET, Growing season length, Net ecosystem CO exchange