Patients' preferences for involvement in the decision-making process for treating diabetic retinopathy

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Lydia Marahrens - , Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (Autor:in)
  • Raimar Kern - , Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Tjalf Ziemssen - , Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (Autor:in)
  • Andreas Fritsche - , Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (Autor:in)
  • Peter Martus - , Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (Autor:in)
  • Focke Ziemssen - , Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (Autor:in)
  • Daniel Roeck - , Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (Autor:in)

Abstract

Background: To assess factors associated with the preferred role of the attending ophthalmologist in the decision-making processes before treating diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: Cross-sectional study of 810 adults attending secondary diabetes care centers (NCT02311504). Diabetes patients were classified using a validated questionnaire in an ophthalmologist-dominant decision-making (ODM), shared decision-making (SDM) and patient-dominant decision-making (PDM) style. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with the decision-making process. Results: A majority of 74.3% patients preferred SDM between ophthalmologist and patient, 17.4% patients wanted ODM, delegating the decision-making process to the ophthalmologist, 8.3% preferred the autonomous style of PDM. Patients wanting ODM were older (OR = 1.2 per decade, p = 0.013), had a lower level of education (OR = 1.4, p = 0.001) and had a higher frequency of consultations per year (OR = 1.3, p = 0.022). Patients with better basic knowledge in DR and memorizing their HbA1c level showed a higher propensity for SDM (OR = 1.1, p = 0.037). Patients wanting PDM had a significantly higher education (OR = 1.3, p = 0.036) and a greater desire for receiving information from self-help groups (OR = 1.3, p = 0.015). Conclusions: The first evaluation of the general patient wishes for the treatment of DR confirmed the concept of SDM, which was favored by three quarters. In particular, older patients with low educational attainment wanted to delegate the decision-making process to the ophthalmologist. Amelioration of ophthalmologic education in diabetic programs might take up patients' propensity for SDM. Regardless of the decision-making group, nearly all patients wanted the medical and scientific information to be transferred by and shared with the ophthalmologist. Trial registration: The study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT02311504) on December 4th 2014.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer139
FachzeitschriftBMC ophthalmology
Jahrgang17
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 9 Aug. 2017
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 28793881
ORCID /0000-0001-8799-8202/work/171553411

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Schlagwörter

  • Adherence, Decision-making, Diabetic retinopathy, Disease knowledge, Treatment