Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reconstruction results of a long incus process defect using 3 different partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP).

STUDY DESIGN: Temporal bone experiments and retrospective case review.

SETTING: Tertiary referral center. EXPERIMENTAL MATERIAL AND PATIENTS: The experimental study was performed on 18 temporal bones; 66 patients with retraction pockets, chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma.

INTERVENTIONS: Ossiculoplasty using 3 different PORP: titanium angle prosthesis, autologous incus interposition, and titanium clip prosthesis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Laser Doppler vibrometry in temporal bones measured transmission properties of the PORP. Patients were retrospectively assessed up to 5 years after surgery. Audiologic data were analyzed for preoperative and postoperative air conduction and air-bone gap at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz. Statistical analyses compared the outcome in the experimental and clinical setting.

RESULTS: Experimentally, the titanium PORP showed similar transmission properties because the overall difference to the intact specimen was -4.14 +/- 0.59 dB for the titanium angle prosthesis and -4.61 +/- 0.57 dB for the titanium clip prosthesis. The transmission after an autologous incus interposition was significantly worse (-9.32 +/- 0.39 dB, p < or = 0.001) compared with the other prostheses. Patients' mean postoperative air-bone gap was 25.5 +/- 1.2 dB and less than 20 dB in at least 66% of cases without any significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION: In the clinical setting, the confounding factors that influence the acoustic outcome after partial ossiculoplasty obscure the prosthesis-related transmission factors that can otherwise be derived in the experimental setting. The results do not generally favor the use of 1 specific prosthesis, rather they suggest that the correct choice of a prosthesis be based on the anatomic and pathophysiologic conditions found in the individual patient.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)332-338
Seitenumfang7
FachzeitschriftOtology and Neurotology
Jahrgang30
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Apr. 2009
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 65549132869
PubMed 19174710
ORCID /0000-0002-3061-0171/work/142241281
ORCID /0000-0003-3894-1175/work/148603667

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Audiometry, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Bone Conduction/physiology, Cholesteatoma/complications, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Ear Ossicles/surgery, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ossicular Prosthesis, Ossicular Replacement/methods, Otitis Media/complications, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Stapes/pathology, Temporal Bone/pathology, Treatment Outcome, Tympanic Membrane Perforation/complications, Tympanoplasty