Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2)
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Kurzartikel (Letter) / Leserbrief mit Originaldaten › Beigetragen › Begutachtung
Beitragende
Abstract
Olfactory dysfunction is common in COVID-19, and sudden-onset dysosmia is an early marker for wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection. Over 10 000 mutations of SARS-CoV-2 have been registered, with variants of concern (VOC) under particular scrutiny. We report a telemedicine-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study with quantitative olfaction testing comparing 79 patients with a confirmed VOC-Delta (n = 21) or wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 infection. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection led to significant decrease of olfactory function in both cohorts. A majority of patients suffered from hyposmia or anosmia at inclusion with only 26 individuals performing normosmic. Sniffin'Sticks total scores were significantly higher for VOC-Delta patients at onset of illness, compared to WT patients (p < 0.001). At 4 weeks follow-up, olfaction scores recovered only partially for WT patients, thus odds of recovery were stronger in VOC-Delta patients. Also, subjective self-rating of chemosensory function was lower in WT, compared to VOC-Delta patients. The need for ongoing olfaction studies and their prognosis in SARS-CoV-2 background remains urgent, also in the light of increasing numbers of olfaction-related patient presentations.
Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Aufsatznummer | 100653 |
Seiten (von - bis) | 100653 |
Fachzeitschrift | World Allergy Organization journal |
Jahrgang | 15 |
Ausgabenummer | 6 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Juni 2022 |
Peer-Review-Status | Ja |
Externe IDs
PubMedCentral | PMC9095455 |
---|---|
Scopus | 85130547283 |
unpaywall | 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100653 |
ORCID | /0000-0001-9713-0183/work/146645227 |