Metamizole/dipyrone for the relief of cancer pain: A systematic review and evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsartikel (Review)BeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Jan Gaertner - , Universitätsklinikum Freiburg (Autor:in)
  • Ulrike M. Stamer - , Universität Bern (Autor:in)
  • Constanze Remi - , Universität Bonn (Autor:in)
  • Raymond Voltz - , Universität zu Köln (Autor:in)
  • Claudia Bausewein - , Universität Bonn (Autor:in)
  • Rainer Sabatowski - , Universitäts SchmerzCentrum, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Stefan Wirz - , GFO CURA Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Gabriele Müller-Mundt - , Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH) (Autor:in)
  • Steffen T. Simon - , Universität zu Köln (Autor:in)
  • Anne Pralong - , Universität zu Köln (Autor:in)
  • Friedemann Nauck - , Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Autor:in)
  • Markus Follmann - , Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V. (DKG) (Autor:in)
  • Lukas Radbruch - , Universität Bonn (Autor:in)
  • Winfried Meißner - , Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)

Abstract

Background: Dipyrone (metamizole) is one of the most widely used non-opioid analgesics for the treatment of cancer pain. Aim: Because evidence-based recommendations are not yet available, a systematic review was conducted for the German Guideline Program in Oncology to provide recommendations for the use of dipyrone in cancer pain. Design: First, a systematic review for clinical trials assessing dipyrone in adult patients with cancer pain was conducted. Endpoints were pain intensity, opioid-sparing effects, safety, and quality of life. Data sources: The search was performed in MedLine, Embase (via Ovid), and the Cochrane Library (1948-2013) and additional hand search was conducted. Finally, recommendations were developed and agreed in a formal structured consensus process by 53 representatives of scientific medical societies and 49 experts. Results: Of 177 retrieved studies, 4 could be included (3 randomized controlled trials and 1 cohort study, n = 252 patients): dipyrone significantly decreased pain intensity compared to placebo, even if low doses (1.5-2 g/day) were used. Higher doses (3 × 2 g/day) were more effective than low doses (3 × 1 g/day), but equally effective as 60 mg oral morphine/day. Pain reduction of dipyrone and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs did not differ significantly. Compared to placebo, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and morphine, the incidence of adverse effects was not increased. Conclusion: Dipyrone can be recommended for the treatment of cancer pain as an alternative to other non-opioids either alone or in combination with opioids. It can be preferred over non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs due to the presumably favorable side effect profile in long-term use, but comparative studies are not available for long-term use.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)26-34
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftPalliative medicine
Jahrgang31
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Jan. 2017
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 27435604

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • Dipyrone, neoplasms, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, pain management, palliative care, review