Management effects on net ecosystem carbon and GHG budgets at European crop sites

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • E. Ceschia - , Centre national d'études spatiales (Autor:in)
  • P. Béziat - , Centre national d'études spatiales (Autor:in)
  • J. F. Dejoux - , Centre national d'études spatiales (Autor:in)
  • M. Aubinet - , University of Liege (Autor:in)
  • C. Bernhofer - , Professur für Meteorologie (Autor:in)
  • B. Bodson - , University of Liege (Autor:in)
  • N. Buchmann - , ETH Zurich (Autor:in)
  • A. Carrara - , Fundación Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo (CEAM) (Autor:in)
  • P. Cellier - , Université Paris-Saclay (Autor:in)
  • P. Di Tommasi - , National Research Council of Italy (CNR) (Autor:in)
  • J. A. Elbers - , Wageningen University & Research (WUR) (Autor:in)
  • W. Eugster - , ETH Zurich (Autor:in)
  • T. Grünwald - , Professur für Meteorologie (Autor:in)
  • C. M.J. Jacobs - , Wageningen University & Research (WUR) (Autor:in)
  • W. W.P. Jans - , Wageningen University & Research (WUR) (Autor:in)
  • M. Jones - , Trinity College Dublin (Autor:in)
  • W. Kutsch - , Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Autor:in)
  • G. Lanigan - , Teagasc - Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (Autor:in)
  • E. Magliulo - , National Research Council of Italy (CNR) (Autor:in)
  • O. Marloie - , Domaine Saint Paul (Autor:in)
  • E. J. Moors - , Wageningen University & Research (WUR) (Autor:in)
  • C. Moureaux - , University of Liege (Autor:in)
  • A. Olioso - , Domaine Saint Paul (Autor:in)
  • B. Osborne - , University College Dublin (Autor:in)
  • M. J. Sanz - , Fundación Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo (CEAM) (Autor:in)
  • M. Saunders - , University College Dublin (Autor:in)
  • P. Smith - , University of Aberdeen (Autor:in)
  • H. Soegaard - , Universität Kopenhagen (Autor:in)
  • M. Wattenbach - , University of Aberdeen (Autor:in)

Abstract

The greenhouse gas budgets of 15 European crop sites covering a large climatic gradient and corresponding to 41 site-years were estimated. The sites included a wide range of management practices (organic and/or mineral fertilisation, tillage or ploughing, with or without straw removal, with or without irrigation, etc.) and were cultivated with 15 representative crop species common to Europe. At all sites, carbon inputs (organic fertilisation and seeds), carbon exports (harvest or fire) and net ecosystem production (NEP), measured with the eddy covariance technique, were calculated. The variability of the different terms and their relative contributions to the net ecosystem carbon budget (NECB) were analysed for all site-years, and the effect of management on NECB was assessed. To account for greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes that were not directly measured on site, we estimated the emissions caused by field operations (EFO) for each site using emission factors from the literature. The EFO were added to the NECB to calculate the total GHG budget (GHGB) for a range of cropping systems and management regimes. N2O emissions were calculated following the IPCC (2007) guidelines, and CH4 emissions were estimated from the literature for the rice crop site only. At the other sites, CH4 emissions/oxidation were assumed to be negligible compared to other contributions to the net GHGB. Finally, we evaluated crop efficiencies (CE) in relation to global warming potential as the ratio of C exported from the field (yield) to the total GHGB. On average, NEP was negative (-284±228gCm-2year-1), and most cropping systems behaved as atmospheric sinks, with sink strength generally increasing with the number of days of active vegetation. The NECB was, on average, 138±239gCm-2year-1, corresponding to an annual loss of about 2.6±4.5% of the soil organic C content, but with high uncertainty. Management strongly influenced the NECB, with organic fertilisation tending to lower the ecosystem carbon budget. On average, emissions caused by fertilisers (manufacturing, packaging, transport, storage and associated N2O emissions) represented close to 76% of EFO. The operation of machinery (use and maintenance) and the use of pesticides represented 9.7 and 1.6% of EFO, respectively. On average, the NEP (through uptake of CO2) represented 88% of the negative radiative forcing, and exported C represented 88% of the positive radiative forcing of a mean total GHGB of 203±253g C-eqm-2year-1. Finally, CE differed considerably among crops and according to management practices within a single crop. Because the CE was highly variable, it is not suitable at this stage for use as an emission factor for management recommendations, and more studies are needed to assess the effects of management on crop efficiency.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)363-383
Seitenumfang21
FachzeitschriftAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Jahrgang139
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15 Nov. 2010
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0003-2263-0073/work/163765991

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • Carbon budget, Crop, Eddy covariance, Europe, Field operations, Greenhouse gases budget, Management