Is diverse and inclusive AI trapped in the gap between reality and algorithmizability?
Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Konferenzbericht/Sammelband/Gutachten › Beitrag in Konferenzband › Beigetragen › Begutachtung
Beitragende
Abstract
We investigate the preconditions of an operationalization of ethics on the example algorithmization, i.e. the mathematical implementation, of the concepts of fairness and diversity in AI. From a non-technical point of view in ethics, this implementation entails two major drawbacks, (1) as it narrows down big concepts to a single model that is deemed manageable, and (2) as it hides unsolved problems of humanity in a system that could be mistaken as the 'solution' to these problems. We encourage extra caution when dealing with such issues and vote for human oversight.
Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Titel | Proceedings of the 5th Northern Lights Deep Learning Conference ({NLDL}) |
| Seiten | 75-80 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2024 |
| Peer-Review-Status | Ja |
Publikationsreihe
| Reihe | Proceedings of Machine Learning Research |
|---|---|
| Band | 233 |
Konferenz
| Titel | 5th Northern Lights Deep Learning Conference |
|---|---|
| Kurztitel | NLDL 2024 |
| Veranstaltungsnummer | 5 |
| Dauer | 9 - 11 Januar 2024 |
| Ort | UiT The Arctic University of Norway |
| Stadt | Tromsø |
| Land | Norwegen |
Externe IDs
| ORCID | /0000-0002-6505-3563/work/191531463 |
|---|