Interplay between RGS2 and childhood adversities in predicting anxiety and depressive disorders: Findings from a general population sample

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Eva Asselmann - , Professur für Behaviorale Epidemiologie, Technische Universität Dresden, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (Autor:in)
  • Johannes Hertel - , Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald (Autor:in)
  • Carsten Oliver Schmidt - , Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald (Autor:in)
  • Georg Homuth - , Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald (Autor:in)
  • Matthias Nauck - , Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung (DZHK) (Autor:in)
  • Katja Beesdo-Baum - , Professur für Behaviorale Epidemiologie, Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Hans Jörgen Grabe - , Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald (Autor:in)
  • Christiane A. Pané-Farré - , Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald (Autor:in)

Abstract

Background: It remains unresolved whether childhood adversities interact with genetic variation in regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2) rs4606 in predicting various anxiety and depressive disorders and whether diagnostic specificity exists in these interactions. Methods: The genotype of RGS2 rs4606 was determined for N = 2,263 adults with European ancestry from the Study of Health in Pomerania. Lifetime anxiety and depressive disorders according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, were assessed with the Munich Composite International Diagnostic Interview (DIA-X/M-CIDI). Childhood adversities were assessed with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ, when participants were aged 29–89). Results: Logistic regressions adjusted for sex and age revealed that rs4606 interacted with total childhood adversity in predicting each diagnostic outcome except for panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, uncorrected and corrected for multiple testing (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06–1.16). That is, carriers of the GG (vs. CC/CG) genotype were at decreased risk for anxiety and/or depression in the presence of low, but at increased risk in the presence of high total childhood adversity. Respective gene–environment (G × E) interactions were found for (a) comorbid anxiety and depressive disorders (OR = 1.13), but neither pure anxiety nor pure depressive disorders and (b) pure/temporally primary anxiety disorders (OR = 1.07), but not pure/temporally primary depressive disorders. The G × E interaction remained associated with depressive disorders after introducing pure/temporally primary anxiety disorders as additional predictor (OR = 1.09). Conclusions: rs4606 alters the risk of developing a range of anxiety but also depressive disorders after childhood adversities. A complex risk pattern of genotype, environmental factors, and preexisting anxiety contributes to subsequent depression development.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1104-1113
Seitenumfang10
Fachzeitschrift Depression and anxiety
Jahrgang35
Ausgabenummer11
Frühes Online-Datum14 Aug. 2018
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Nov. 2018
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 30107643
ORCID /0000-0002-9687-5527/work/142235301

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • anxiety/anxiety disorders, epidemiology, genetics, gene–environment, stress