Impella for the Management of Ventricular Septal Defect Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A European Multicenter Registry

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Clement Delmas - , Rangueil University Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Hélène Barbosa - , Rangueil University Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Charles-Henri David - , University Hospital of Nantes (Autor:in)
  • Frédéric Bouisset - , Rangueil University Hospital (Autor:in)
  • Pierre-Guillaume Piriou - , University Hospital of Nantes (Autor:in)
  • François Roubille - , Cardiology Department INI-CRT PhyMedExp INSERM CNRS CHU de Montpellier (Autor:in)
  • Juergen Leick - , Herzzentrum Trier (Autor:in)
  • Marin Pavlov - , University Hospital Dubrava (Autor:in)
  • Guillaume Leurent - , Cardiologie Department (Autor:in)
  • Evgenij V Potapov - , Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery (Autor:in)
  • Axel Linke - , Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie (am Herzzentrum), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Johannes Mierke - , Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie (am Herzzentrum), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)
  • Pia Lanmüller - , Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery (Autor:in)
  • Norman Mangner - , Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie (am Herzzentrum), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden (Autor:in)

Abstract

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a rare but severe complication of myocardial infarction (MI). Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be used as a bridge to VSD closure, heart transplantation, or ventricular assist device. We describe the use of Impella device in this context based on a multicenter European retrospective registry (17 centers responded). Twenty-eight post-MI VSD patients were included (Impella device were 2.5 for 1 patient, CP for 20, 5.0 for 5, and unknown for 2). All patients were in cardiogenic shock with multiple organ failure (SAPS II 41 [interquantile range {IQR} = 27-53], lactate 4.0 ± 3.5 mmol/L) and catecholamine support (dobutamine 55% and norepinephrine 96%). Additional temporary MCS was used in 14 patients (50%), mainly extracorporeal life support (ECLS) (n = 9, 32%). Severe bleedings were frequent (50%). In-hospital and 1 year mortalities were 75%. Ventricular septal defect management was surgical for 36% of patients, percutaneous for 21%, and conservative for 43%. Only surgically managed patients survived (70% in-hospital survival). Type and combination of temporary MCS used were not associated with mortality (Impella alone or in combination with intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP] or ECLS, p = 0.84). Impella use in patients with post-MI VSD is feasible but larger prospective registries are necessary to further elucidate potential benefits of left ventricular unloading in this setting.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)e491-e499
Fachzeitschrift ASAIO journal : official journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
Jahrgang69
Ausgabenummer12
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Dez. 2023
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 85178650666

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Humans, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Myocardial Infarction/complications, Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology, Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects, Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/adverse effects, Registries, Heart Septal Defects, Ventricular/surgery, Treatment Outcome