Impact of socioeconomic aspects on cardiac implantable electronic device treatment and application of the EHRA guidelines: A European comparison

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Marwin Bannehr - , Herzzentrum Brandenburg Bernau, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Autor:in)
  • David Reiners - , Herzzentrum Brandenburg Bernau, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Autor:in)
  • Michael Lichtenauer - , Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität (Autor:in)
  • Kristen Kopp - , Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität (Autor:in)
  • Peter Jirak - , Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität (Autor:in)
  • Christian Georgi - , Herzzentrum Brandenburg Bernau, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Autor:in)
  • Christian Butter - , Herzzentrum Brandenburg Bernau, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Autor:in)
  • Christoph Edlinger - , Herzzentrum Brandenburg Bernau, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität (Autor:in)

Abstract

Background: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) have become an indispensable part in everyday clinical practice in cardiology. The indications for CIED implantation are based on the guidelines of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Nevertheless, numbers of CIED implantations in Europe are subject to considerable differences. We hypothesized that reimbursements linked to the respective health systems may influence implantation behavior. Methods: Based on the EHRA White Book 2017, CIED implantation data as well as socioeconomic key figures were collected, in particular gross domestic product (GDP) and share of gross domestic product spent on healthcare. Implantation numbers for pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization treatment as well as all in total were assessed, compared with the health care expenditures and visualized using heat maps. Results: Total implantation numbers per 100,000 inhabitants varied from 196.53 (Germany) to 2.81 (Kosovo). Higher implantation numbers correlated moderately with a higher GDP (r = 0.456, p 0.002) and higher health expenditure (r = 0.586, p < 0.001). The annual financial resources per inhabitant were also subject to fluctuations ranging from 9476 $ (Switzerland) to 140 $ (Ukraine); however, there were countries with high financial means, such as Switzerland or Scandinavian countries, which showed significantly lower implantation rates. Conclusion: There were considerable differences in CIED implantations in Europe. These seem to be explained in part by socioeconomic disparities within Europe. Also, a potential influence by the respective remuneration system is likely.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)646-653
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftWiener klinische Wochenschrift
Jahrgang134
Ausgabenummer17-18
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Sept. 2022
Peer-Review-StatusJa
Extern publiziertJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 35916927

Schlagworte

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Schlagwörter

  • CIED, Disparity, GDP, Health expenditure