Genesungsbegleitung: Inanspruchnahme und Nutzenbewertung aus Betroffenenperspektive - Ergebnisse einer Beobachtungsstudie

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Uta Gühne - , Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)
  • Daniel Richter - , Universität Leipzig, Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (Autor:in)
  • Johanna Breilmann - , Universität Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Esther Täumer - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)
  • Peter Falkai - , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU) (Autor:in)
  • Reinhold Kilian - , Universität Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Andreas Allgöwer - , Universität Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Klemens Ajayi - , kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München gGmbH (Autor:in)
  • Jessica Baumgärtner - , Universität Augsburg (Autor:in)
  • Peter Brieger - , kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München gGmbH (Autor:in)
  • Karel Frasch - , Universität Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg (Autor:in)
  • Stephan Heres - , kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München gGmbH (Autor:in)
  • Markus Jäger - , Universität Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Kempten (Autor:in)
  • Andreas Küthmann - , Bezirkskrankenhaus Memmingen (Autor:in)
  • Albert Putzhammer - , Bezirkskrankenhaus Kaufbeuren (Autor:in)
  • Bertram Schneeweiβ - , kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München gGmbH (Autor:in)
  • Michael Schwarz - , kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München gGmbH (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Becker - , Universität Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Markus Kösters - , Universität Ulm (Autor:in)
  • Steffi G. Riedel-Heller - , Universität Leipzig (Autor:in)

Abstract

Objective Peer support is playing an increasing role in the treatment of severely mentally ill people. International findings are available on its effectiveness. However, little is known about knowledge, use and benefit assessment in Germany. This paper addresses this question and presents results from an observational study with 10 participating clinics in southern Germany. Methods As part of the observational cross-sectional study with people with severe mental illness (IMPPETUS, N=359), sociodemographic and illness- and treatment-associated data were collected by trained study staff between March 2019 and September 2019. Binary logistic regression was used to analyse a possible association with peer support use. Results 38% (N=138) of respondents reported knowledge about the possibility of peer support; 15% (N=55) affirmed its use. Use of peer support varied across sites (between 6.5 and 37.5%) and was associated with household income. Significantly less frequent use of peer support was among those with high versus low household income (OR=0.20 [95% CI: 0.06-0.68], p=0.01). Of respondents with peer support use (N=55), 78% reported perceiving peer support to be helpful or highly helpful. Discussion Peer support not only proves to be effective under study conditions with regard to various outcomes, but is also assessed as beneficial under routine conditions in a defined care region by the majority of users. However, only a few respondents knew and used the possibility of peer support. Conclusion In order to implement peer support more strongly, information about this kind of service should be provided more effectively and a dialogue about successful implementation experiences should be initiated on a regional level.

Details

OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)499-507
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftPPmP Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie
Jahrgang71
Ausgabenummer12
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Dez. 2021
Peer-Review-StatusJa
Extern publiziertJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 34872153
ORCID /0000-0001-7018-6021/work/168207916

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • implementation, peer support, peer support worker, severe mental illness, utilisation