Evaluation of mobile clinics by MSF in pastoralist community in Doolo Zone, Somali region, Ethiopia

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Birhanu Sahelie - , Médecins sans frontières (Gemeinsame:r Erstautor:in)
  • Luke Baertlein - , Médecins sans frontières (Gemeinsame:r Erstautor:in)
  • Bashir AIi Dubad - , Médecins sans frontières (Autor:in)
  • Mohammed Osman - , Ethiopian Somali Regional State Health Bureau (Jigjiga) (Autor:in)
  • Nathan Post - , Médecins sans frontières (Autor:in)
  • Beverley Stringer - , Médecins sans frontières (Autor:in)
  • Turid Piening - , Médecins sans frontières (Autor:in)
  • Hanna Majanen - , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Autor:in)
  • Istifanus Chindong Damulak - , Médecins sans frontières (Autor:in)
  • Elburg Van Boetzalaer - , Médecins sans frontières (Autor:in)
  • Anna Kuehne - , Zentrum für evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Médecins sans frontières, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Autor:in)
  • Patrick Keating - , Médecins sans frontières (Letztautor:in)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Somali region in Ethiopia has poor health infrastructure, coupled with the adversity experienced by the largely pastoralist population through frequent droughts, disease outbreaks and conflict. From January 2019, MSF strategically focused on improving access to primary healthcare in the Doolo zone of the Somali region by providing 15-20 mobile clinics covering a wide geographical area. We aimed to evaluate the extent to which mobile clinics were an appropriate and effective modality to deliver healthcare for populations living in the region.

METHODS: In this mixed-methods study, we conducted a descriptive analysis of 24 months of routine mobile clinic data (February 2019 to January 2021) to evaluate the appropriateness and effectiveness of mobile clinics. We conducted a patient satisfaction survey to assess perceived benefits and challenges, as well as seven interviews with MSF medical staff and four focus group discussions with community members from mobile clinic sites to explore the appropriateness, effectiveness, and connectedness of mobile clinics.

RESULTS: MSF mobile clinics conducted 90,542 outpatient consultations, across 30 mobile clinic sites during the two-year period. However, there were gaps in continuity of care. The ratio of follow-up-to-first antenatal care visits was 0.82, and the ratio of third-to-first dose of DTP/Hib/HepB vaccine was 0.39. The current mobile clinic strategy is generally well perceived by the community in terms of the quality of services provided. However, MSF staff and community members expressed that its appropriateness and effectiveness are limited by mobile clinic opening hours, large patient volumes, referral policies, staffing, and drug supply issues.

CONCLUSIONS: Limited opening hours, large patient volumes, weak referral processes and supply issues impacted the appropriateness and effectiveness of healthcare provision by mobile clinics to this pastoralist population. These challenges are consistent with those faced by mobile clinics in other contexts. To enhance the effectiveness and appropriateness of mobile clinics for pastoralist populations requires collaboration with both community members and local authorities to design and regularly review the locations, frequency, healthcare service package and referral policies of mobile clinics.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer158
Seitenumfang1
FachzeitschriftBMC health services research
Jahrgang25
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 28 Jan. 2025
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMedCentral PMC11773711
Scopus 85217189971

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • Adolescent, Adult, Ethiopia, Female, Focus Groups, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mobile Health Units/organization & administration, Patient Satisfaction, Somalia/ethnology, Young Adult