Evaluation of bacterial glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether and 2H-18O biomarker proxies along a central European topsoil transect

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Johannes Hepp - , Universität Bayreuth, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg (Autor:in)
  • Imke Kathrin Schäfer - , Universität Bern (Autor:in)
  • Verena Lanny - , ETH Zurich (Autor:in)
  • Jörg Franke - , Universität Bern (Autor:in)
  • Marcel Bliedtner - , Universität Bern, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)
  • Kazimierz Rozanski - , AGH University of Science and Technology (Autor:in)
  • Bruno Glaser - , Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg (Autor:in)
  • Michael Zech - , Professur für Physische Geographie mit Schwerpunkt Paläoumweltforschung (Heisenberg), Institut für Geographie, Technische Universität Dresden, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg (Autor:in)
  • Timothy Ian Eglinton - , ETH Zurich (Autor:in)
  • Roland Zech - , Universität Bern, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (Autor:in)

Abstract

Molecular fossils, like bacterial branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (brGDGTs), and the stable isotopic composition of biomarkers, such as δ2H of leaf waxderived n-alkanes (δ2Hn-alkane) or δ18O of hemicellulosederived sugars (δ18Osugar), are increasingly used for the reconstruction of past climate and environmental conditions. Plant-derived δ2Hn-alkane and δ18Osugar values record the isotopic composition of plant source water (δ2Hsource-water and δ18Osource-water), which usually reflects mean annual precipitation (δ2Hprecipiation and δ18Oprecipiation), modulated by evapotranspirative leaf water enrichment and biosynthetic fractionation ("bio). Accuracy and precision of respective proxies should be ideally evaluated at a regional scale. For this study, we analysed topsoils below coniferous and deciduous forests as well as grassland soils along a central European transect in order to investigate the variability and robustness of various proxies and to identify effects related to vegetation. Soil pH values derived from brGDGTs correlate reasonably well with measured soil pH values but are systematically overestimated (1pH D 0:6 ± 0:6). The branched vs. isoprenoid tetraether index (BIT) can give some indication whether the pH reconstruction is reliable. Temperatures derived from brGDGTs overestimate mean annual air temperatures slightly (1TMA D 0:5 °C ± 2.4). Apparent isotopic fractionation ("n-alkane/precipitation and "sugar=precipitation) is lower for grassland sites than for forest sites due to signal damping; i.e. grass biomarkers do not record the full evapotranspirative leaf water enrichment. Coupling δ2Hn-alkane with δ18O sugar allows us to reconstruct the stable isotopic composition of the source water more accurately than without the coupled approach (1δ2H D ∼-21‰ ± 22‰ and 1d18O D ∼-2:9 ‰ ± 2.8 ‰). Similarly, relative humidity during daytime and the vegetation period (RHMDV) can be reconstructed using the coupled isotope approach (1RHMDV D∼-17 ± 12). Especially for coniferous sites, reconstructed RHMDV values as well as source water isotope composition underestimate the measured values. This can likely be explained by understorey grass vegetation at the coniferous sites contributing significantly to the n-alkane pool but only marginally to the sugar pool in the topsoils. Vegetation-dependent variable signal damping and "bio (regarding 2H between n-alkanes and leaf water) along our European transect are difficult to quantify but likely contribute to the observed underestimation in the source water isotope composition and RH reconstructions. Microclimate variability could cause the rather large uncertainties. Vegetation-related effects do, by contrast, not affect the brGDGT-derived reconstructions. Overall, GDGTs and the coupled d2Hn-alkane d18Osugar approach have great potential for more quantitative paleoclimate reconstructions.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)741-756
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftBiogeosciences
Jahrgang17
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 12 Feb. 2020
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0002-9586-0390/work/170107067