The authors regret that there is a mistake in Equations (46)–(48), which are stated correctly as and [Formula presented] In Equations (1) and (2), the position vector is correctly stated as [Formula presented], which is a fixed point in space. As a consequence, the displacement gradient changes, and is stated correctly in Equation (3). The linearization of the displacement gradient in Equation (64) is stated correctly as [Formula presented] The material parameters to model concrete, and perform a physical validation are different. For Section 5.3.1, the updated material parameters are listed in Table 1, and the identification and validation results are shown in Fig. 1, replacing Figs. 17(a) and (b). The newly identified material parameters for Section 5.3.2 are given in Tables 2 and 3 and the updated comparisons of experiments and simulations are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. For Section 5.3.3, the new material parameters are summarized in Table 4 and the results of the simulations compared with experiments are displayed in Figs. 4–6. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.