Comparative validation of machine learning algorithms for surgical workflow and skill analysis with the HeiChole benchmark

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftKurze Umfrage/ÜbersichtsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Martin Wagner - , Universität Heidelberg, Nationales Zentrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Beat Peter Müller-Stich - , Universität Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Anna Kisilenko - , Universität Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Duc Tran - , Universität Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Patrick Heger - , Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Lars Mündermann - , Karl Storz SE & Co. KG (Autor:in)
  • David M. Lubotsky - , Universität Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Benjamin Müller - , Universität Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Tornike Davitashvili - , Universität Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Manuela Capek - , Universität Heidelberg, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Annika Reinke - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Carissa Reid - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Tong Yu - , Université de Strasbourg, France (Autor:in)
  • Armine Vardazaryan - , Université de Strasbourg, France (Autor:in)
  • Chinedu Innocent Nwoye - , Université de Strasbourg, France (Autor:in)
  • Nicolas Padoy - , Université de Strasbourg, France (Autor:in)
  • Xinyang Liu - , Children's National Medical Center (Autor:in)
  • Eung Joo Lee - , University of Maryland, College Park (Autor:in)
  • Constantin Disch - , Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine (Autor:in)
  • Hans Meine - , Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine, University of Bremen (Autor:in)
  • Tong Xia - , Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology (Autor:in)
  • Fucang Jia - , Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology (Autor:in)
  • Satoshi Kondo - , Konica Minolta Inc (Autor:in)
  • Wolfgang Reiter - , Wintegral GmbH (Autor:in)
  • Yueming Jin - , Chinese University of Hong Kong (Autor:in)
  • Yonghao Long - , Chinese University of Hong Kong (Autor:in)
  • Meirui Jiang - , Chinese University of Hong Kong (Autor:in)
  • Qi Dou - , Chinese University of Hong Kong (Autor:in)
  • Pheng Ann Heng - , Chinese University of Hong Kong (Autor:in)
  • Isabell Twick - , Caresyntax GmbH (Autor:in)
  • Kadir Kirtac - , Caresyntax GmbH (Autor:in)
  • Enes Hosgor - , Caresyntax GmbH (Autor:in)
  • Jon Lindström Bolmgren - , Caresyntax GmbH (Autor:in)
  • Michael Stenzel - , Caresyntax GmbH (Autor:in)
  • Björn von Siemens - , Caresyntax GmbH (Autor:in)
  • Long Zhao - , Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co. Ltd. (Autor:in)
  • Zhenxiao Ge - , Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co. Ltd. (Autor:in)
  • Haiming Sun - , Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co. Ltd. (Autor:in)
  • Di Xie - , Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co. Ltd. (Autor:in)
  • Mengqi Guo - , National University of Singapore (Autor:in)
  • Daochang Liu - , Peking University (Autor:in)
  • Hannes G. Kenngott - , Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Felix Nickel - , Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Moritz von Frankenberg - , Krankenhaus Salem (Autor:in)
  • Franziska Mathis-Ullrich - , Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (Autor:in)
  • Annette Kopp-Schneider - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) (Autor:in)
  • Lena Maier-Hein - , Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universität Heidelberg (Autor:in)
  • Stefanie Speidel - , Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (Partner: UKD, MFD, HZDR, DKFZ), Exzellenzcluster CeTI: Zentrum für Taktiles Internet (Autor:in)
  • Sebastian Bodenstedt - , Technische Universität Dresden (Autor:in)

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical workflow and skill analysis are key technologies for the next generation of cognitive surgical assistance systems. These systems could increase the safety of the operation through context-sensitive warnings and semi-autonomous robotic assistance or improve training of surgeons via data-driven feedback. In surgical workflow analysis up to 91% average precision has been reported for phase recognition on an open data single-center video dataset. In this work we investigated the generalizability of phase recognition algorithms in a multicenter setting including more difficult recognition tasks such as surgical action and surgical skill. Methods: To achieve this goal, a dataset with 33 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos from three surgical centers with a total operation time of 22 h was created. Labels included framewise annotation of seven surgical phases with 250 phase transitions, 5514 occurences of four surgical actions, 6980 occurences of 21 surgical instruments from seven instrument categories and 495 skill classifications in five skill dimensions. The dataset was used in the 2019 international Endoscopic Vision challenge, sub-challenge for surgical workflow and skill analysis. Here, 12 research teams trained and submitted their machine learning algorithms for recognition of phase, action, instrument and/or skill assessment. Results: F1-scores were achieved for phase recognition between 23.9% and 67.7% (n = 9 teams), for instrument presence detection between 38.5% and 63.8% (n = 8 teams), but for action recognition only between 21.8% and 23.3% (n = 5 teams). The average absolute error for skill assessment was 0.78 (n = 1 team). Conclusion: Surgical workflow and skill analysis are promising technologies to support the surgical team, but there is still room for improvement, as shown by our comparison of machine learning algorithms. This novel HeiChole benchmark can be used for comparable evaluation and validation of future work. In future studies, it is of utmost importance to create more open, high-quality datasets in order to allow the development of artificial intelligence and cognitive robotics in surgery.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer102770
FachzeitschriftMedical Image Analysis
Jahrgang86
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Mai 2023
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 36889206

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • Endoscopic vision, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Surgical data science, Surgical workflow analysis