Clinical research in endometrial cancer: consensus recommendations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Übersichtsartikel (Review) › Beigetragen › Begutachtung
Beitragende
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
- Leiden University
- Seoul National University
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- University of Western Australia
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe
- Erasmus University Rotterdam
- University of Ulsan
- IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
- Humanitas University
- University of Melbourne
- Radboud University Nijmegen
- University of Sydney
- IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
- New York University
- GOG-Foundation
- Te Pūtahitanga o Te Waipounamu
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group
- Kolkata Gynecological Oncology Trials and Translational Research Group (KolGOTrg)
- Peaches Womb Cancer Trust
- Cancer Research Advocates Forum
- Stanford University
- Universitat de Barcelona
- University of Lleida
- Centre Léon Bérard
- University of Utah
- Loyola University Chicago
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute
- Medizinische Universität Wien
- Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
- Washington University St. Louis
- University of British Columbia
- Kaiser Permanente
Abstract
The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Endometrial Cancer Consensus Conference on Clinical Research (ECCC) was held in Incheon, South Korea, Nov 2–3, 2023. The aims were to develop consensus statements for future trials in endometrial cancer to achieve harmonisation on design elements, select important questions, and identify unmet needs. All 33 GCIG member groups participated in the development, refinement, and finalisation of 18 statements within four topic groups, addressing adjuvant treatment in high-risk disease; treatment for metastatic and recurrent disease; trial designs for rare endometrial cancer subgroups and special circumstances; and specific methodology and adaptation for trials in low-resource settings. In addition, eight areas of unmet need were identified. This was the first GCIG Consensus Conference to include patient advocates and an expert on inclusion, diversity, equity, and access to take part in all aspects of the process and output. Four early-career investigators were also selected for participation, ensuring that they represented different GCIG member groups and regions. Unanimous consensus was obtained for 16 of the 18 statements, with 97% concordance for the remaining two. Using the described methodology from previous Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conferences, this conference did not require even one minority statement. The high acceptance rate following active involvement in the preparation, discussion, and refinement of the statements by all representatives confirmed the consensus progress within a global academic setting, and the expectation that the ECCC will lead to greater harmonisation, actualisation, inclusion, and resolution of unmet needs in clinical research for individuals living with and beyond endometrial cancer worldwide.
Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | e420-e431 |
Fachzeitschrift | The Lancet Oncology |
Jahrgang | 25 |
Ausgabenummer | 9 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Sept. 2024 |
Peer-Review-Status | Ja |
Externe IDs
PubMed | 39214113 |
---|