Challenges for transboundary river management in Eastern Europe - three case studies

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsartikel (Review)BeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Fabian Krengel - , Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Autor:in)
  • Christian Bernhofer - , Professur für Meteorologie (Autor:in)
  • Sergey Chalov - , Lomonosov Moscow State University (Autor:in)
  • Vasily Efimov - , Lomonosov Moscow State University (Autor:in)
  • Ludmila Efimova - , Lomonosov Moscow State University (Autor:in)
  • Liudmila Gorbachova - , National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Autor:in)
  • Michal Habel - , Kazimierz Wielki University (Autor:in)
  • Bjoern Helm - , Professur für Siedlungswasserwirtschaft (Autor:in)
  • Ivan Kruhlov - , Ivan Franko National University of L'viv (Autor:in)
  • Yuri Nabyvanets - , National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Autor:in)
  • Natalya Osadcha - , National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Autor:in)
  • Volodymyr Osadchyi - , National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Autor:in)
  • Thomas Pluntke - , Professur für Meteorologie (Autor:in)
  • Tobias Reeh - , Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Autor:in)
  • Pavel Terskii - , Lomonosov Moscow State University (Autor:in)
  • Daniel Karthe - , German Mongolian Inst Resources & Technol, Environm Engn Sect (Autor:in)

Abstract

The transboundary river basins shared between Russia, Ukraine and the European Union pose unique challenges for management because of differences regarding not only the legal framework but also related to monitoring practices and water utilization. Using the example of three river basins - the Desna (shared by Russia and Ukraine), the Western Dvina (shared by Russia, Belarus, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia) and the Western Bug (shared by Ukraine, Belarus and Poland) - this paper provides an analysis of current challenges with respect to transboundary water resources management in Eastern Europe. This assessment is based on a comparison of similarities and disparities concerning the physical and human geography of the basins (and their national sub-basins) as well as specific problems related to water pollution caused by urban, agricultural and industrial water usage both in the recent past and today. All three catchments have a similar size, climate and hydrological characteristics. However, there are different challenges regarding up-and downstream sections of the respective basins: pollution input in the Western Bug originates primarily from upstream sources in Ukraine and Belarus, whereas ecological problems in the Desna and Western Dvina persist principally downstream, i.e. in Ukraine respectively Belarus and Latvia. Despite some differences between the basins, it is concluded that interstate cooperation is an important prerequisite for integrated water resources management (IWRM) in all of the studied basins. This analysis identified several key challenges related to start or continue with IWRM, including pollution mitigation, improved monitoring, appropriate governance, climate change and its effect on water balances in the catchments, capacity development and thorough system understanding.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)157-172
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftDie Erde
Jahrgang149
Ausgabenummer2-3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2018
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0003-4963-7523/work/142242905
ORCID /0000-0001-8330-1156/work/142248813
Bibtex krengel_challenges_2018

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • IWRM, transboundary rivers, Eastern Europe, water pollution, Western Bug, Desna, Western Dvina, WESTERN BUG RIVER, BASIN MANAGEMENT, CLIMATE-CHANGE, WATER-QUALITY, COUNTRIES, UKRAINE, IMPACT, SCALE