Captive breeding of European freshwater mussels as a conservation tool: A review

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftÜbersichtsartikel (Review)BeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • Juergen Geist - , Technische Universität München (Autor:in)
  • Frankie Thielen - , Fondation Hëllef fir d'Natur/natur & ëmwelt (Autor:in)
  • Louise Lavictoire - , Freshwater Biological Association (Autor:in)
  • Rebecca Hoess - , Technische Universität München (Autor:in)
  • Reinhard Altmueller - (Autor:in)
  • Magalie Baudrimont - , Université de Bordeaux (Autor:in)
  • Christine Blaize - , Bretagne Vivante – Société pour l’ Étude et la Protection de la Nature en Bretagne (SEPNB) (Autor:in)
  • Miquel Campos - , Freshwater Mussel Breeding Laboratory of Lake Banyoles, Autonomous University of Barcelona (Autor:in)
  • Paul Carroll - , Kilmeaden Water Plant (Autor:in)
  • Daniel Daill - , Consultants in Aquatic Ecology and Engineering – blattfisch e.U. (Autor:in)
  • Wolfgang Degelmann - , Bund Naturschutz Hof (Autor:in)
  • Rainer Dettmer - (Autor:in)
  • Marco Denic - , Landschaftspflegeverband Passau e.V. (Autor:in)
  • Pierrick Dury - , Fédération de Pêche du Finistère (Autor:in)
  • Elvira de Eyto - , Marine Institute (Autor:in)
  • Felix Grunicke - , Professur für Limnologie (Gewässerökologie) (Autor:in)
  • Clemens Gumpinger - , Consultants in Aquatic Ecology and Engineering – blattfisch e.U. (Autor:in)
  • Per J. Jakobsen - , University of Bergen (Autor:in)
  • Katrin Kaldma - , Estonian University of Life Sciences, State Forest Management Centre (Autor:in)
  • Kunnar Klaas - , State Forest Management Centre (Autor:in)
  • Alexia Legeay - , Université de Bordeaux (Autor:in)
  • Jon Hamner Mageroy - , Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (Autor:in)
  • Evelyn A. Moorkens - , Trinity College Dublin (Autor:in)
  • Grégory Motte - , DEMNA (Autor:in)
  • Keiko Nakamura - , Sociedad Aragonesa de Gestión Agroambiental S.L.U., University of Valencia (Autor:in)
  • Paz Ondina - , University of Santiago de Compostela (Autor:in)
  • Martin Österling - , Karlstad University (Autor:in)
  • Christian Pichler-Scheder - , Consultants in Aquatic Ecology and Engineering – blattfisch e.U. (Autor:in)
  • Ondřej Spisar - , BIVALVIA s.r.o. (Autor:in)
  • Joaquim Reis - , Universidade de Lisboa (Autor:in)
  • Lea D. Schneider - , The Rural Economy and Agricultural Society (Autor:in)
  • Arno Schwarzer - (Autor:in)
  • Heidi Selheim - , Biologische Station StädteRegion Aachen e. V. (Autor:in)
  • Joaquín Soler - , Université de Tours (Autor:in)
  • Jouni Taskinen - , University of Jyväskylä (Autor:in)
  • John Taylor - , Gwent Angling Society, Cynrig Fish Culture Unit (Autor:in)
  • Ben Strachan - , Environment Agency (Autor:in)
  • Niklas Wengström - , Swedish Anglers Association (Autor:in)
  • Tadeusz Zając - , Polish Academy of Sciences (Autor:in)

Abstract

Freshwater mussels are declining throughout their range. Their important ecological functions along with insufficient levels of natural recruitment have prompted captive breeding for population augmentation and questions about the usefulness and applicability of such measures. This article reviews the current state of captive breeding and rearing programmes for freshwater mussels in Europe. It considers the various species, strategies, and techniques of propagation, as well as the different levels of effort required according to rearing method, highlighting the key factors of success. Within the last 30 years, 46 breeding activities in 16 European countries have been reported, mainly of Margaritifera margaritifera and Unio crassus. Some facilities propagate species that are in a very critical situation, such as Pseudunio auricularius, Unio mancus, and Unio ravoisieri, or multiple species concurrently. In some streams, the number of released captive-bred mussels already exceeds the size of the remaining natural population. Rearing efforts range from highly intensive laboratory incubation to lower intensity methods using in-river mussel cages or silos. Most breeding efforts are funded by national and EU LIFE(+) grants, are well documented, and consider the genetic integrity of the propagated mussels. Limited long-term funding perspectives, the availability of experienced staff, water quality, and feeding/survival during early life stages are seen as the most important challenges. Successful captive breeding programmes need to be combined with restoration of the habitats into which the mussels are released. This work will benefit from an evidence-based approach, knowledge exchange among facilities, and an overall breeding strategy comprising multiple countries and conservation units.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1321-1359
Seitenumfang39
FachzeitschriftAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Jahrgang33
Ausgabenummer11
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Nov. 2023
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

ORCID /0000-0002-8250-0986/work/170586652

Schlagworte

Schlagwörter

  • aquaculture, captive breeding, conservation translocation, freshwater mussel culturing, Margaritifera margaritifera, propagation, reintroduction, Unio crassus