Arterial Collaterals and Endovascular Treatment Effect in Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct: A Secondary Analysis of the TENSION Trial

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

  • TENSION Investigators - (Autor:in)
  • Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie
  • Universität Hamburg
  • Universität Heidelberg
  • Hospices civils de Lyon
  • Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • University of Oslo
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
  • University of Calgary
  • Karlsuniversität Prag
  • Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne
  • Universität Aarhus
  • Comenius University
  • Medizinische Universität Graz
  • Universität Bonn
  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
  • Dresdner Neurovaskuläres Centrum
  • Fakultná Nemocnica Trnava
  • DIAKO Krankenhaus Flensburg gGmbH
  • Klinikum Bremen-Mitte
  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
  • Universität Witten/Herdecke
  • Aretaieion University Hospital
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE)
  • Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
  • Masaryk University

Abstract

Background: Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that endovascular thrombectomy reduces functional disability in patients with large ischemic stroke; arterial collateral status might be used to select these patients for endovascular thrombectomy. Purpose: To investigate whether arterial collateral status modifies the treatment effect of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with large ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods: The Efficacy and Safety of Thrombectomy in Stroke with Extended Lesion and Extended Time Window (TENSION) trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized study investigating participants with acute large ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion. Participants with an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score of 3–5 were enrolled at 41 participating centers between July 2018 and February 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo either endovascular thrombectomy with best medical treatment or best medical treatment alone within 12 hours from stroke onset. Collateral status was graded on pretreatment single-phase CT angiography (CTA) images using the Tan score and dichotomized into poor (grade, 0–1) or good (grade, 2–3) based on the extent of collateral supply filling the affected middle cerebral artery territory. The primary outcome was the shift on the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results: Of 253 randomized patients, 201 with pretreatment CTA were included (median age, 74 years; IQR, 66–80 years; 103 [51.2%] female patients; 103 [51.2%] patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy). Endovascular thrombectomy compared with best medical treatment (adjusted common odds ratio [OR], 3.69; 95% CI: 2.12, 6.54; P < .001) and good collaterals compared with poor collaterals (adjusted common OR, 2.88; 95% CI: 1.63, 5.11; P < .001) were independently associated with a shift in the 90-day mRS scores toward better functional outcomes. The treatment effect of endovascular thrombectomy over best medical treatment was not modified by collateral status (interaction, P = .88). The treatment effect of endovascular thrombectomy versus best medical treatment was found in patients with good collaterals (adjusted common OR, 3.93; 95% CI: 1.65, 9.69; P = .002) and poor collaterals (adjusted common OR, 3.92; 95% CI: 1.86, 8.52; P < .001). Conclusion: In this secondary analysis of data from the TENSION trial, endovascular thrombectomy reduced 90-day functional disability compared with best medical treatment in patients with good and poor collaterals. These findings suggest that patients with large ischemic stroke manifesting within 12 hours after onset should undergo endovascular thrombectomy irrespective of single-phase CTA collateral status.

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummere242401
FachzeitschriftRadiology
Jahrgang314
Ausgabenummer2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2025
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

PubMed 39998372
ORCID /0000-0001-7465-8700/work/203071731

Schlagworte