Arbeitsschutz „im Huckepack“ – ein alternatives ¬Konzept zur Ansprache von Unternehmen auf Sicherheit und Gesundheit bei der Arbeit

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftForschungsartikelBeigetragenBegutachtung

Beitragende

Abstract

Background: Employers are obliged to implement occupational safety measures. However, implementation rates are rising only very slowly. Reservations about the issues and official requirements are widespread among entrepreneurs. Objective: There is still a great need for statutory accident insurance organ-isations to successfully address entrepreneurs so that they can ensure the health and safety of their workers. Method: Based on findings from cognitive and learning psychology, an alternative approach, known as the “piggyback” method, was developed. Results: By linking the health and safety topics with positively evaluated contextual stimuli, the reservations can be circumvented and a first positive change in attitude can be achieved. For a sustainable change in behaviour, a deeper dive into the issues is necessary. Conclusions: The “piggyback” method can be used especially to reach entrepreneurs who have shown little motivation for implementation so far. The concept can be applied to different fields of prevention, but still requires further testing and evaluation. Ethical aspects must also be taken into account during implementation.

Details

OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)390–395
Seitenumfang6
FachzeitschriftArbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin, Umweltmedizin : ASU ; Zeitschrift für medizinische Prävention (online)
Jahrgang58
Ausgabenummer6
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2023
Peer-Review-StatusJa

Externe IDs

Scopus 85166343709
Mendeley ad5ee683-30c6-377e-af8c-89c74f408c64

Schlagworte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Schlagwörter

  • information processing, targeting concept, entrepreneurs, occupational health and safety, entrepreneurs, information processing, occupational health and safety, targeting concept